The best source for the Second Generation Neon - Period.
 Watched TopicsWatched Topics   FAQFAQ   RulesBoard Rules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks  :: Register
 ProfileProfile   GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2nd gen plastic SOHC intake vs Magnum intake?

Post new topic   Reply to topic    2GN.ORG Forum Index -> Naturally Aspirated
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
2GN Registrant

Age: 47
Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Posts: 207

Post: #1   PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:16 am    Post subject: 2nd gen plastic SOHC intake vs Magnum intake? Reply with quote

I've read that the stock plastic 2nd gen SOHC intake is actually pretty good, and I've read about how the Magnum intake works and why it is how it is.

Given an otherwise equal engine setup, how does a plastic intake compare to the Magnum intake on the dyno? I believe it's only over 6000 rpm that the Magnum is better, but even then not by a whole lot.

If we need to be specific about the engine for comparison purposes, let's say it's a stock Magnum engine with a ported and polished Magnum head, Crane 12 cam, and Pacesetter header. So stock ASIDE from these listed mods.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Neon revivalist
2GN Registrant

Age: 42
Joined: 16 Nov 2011
Posts: 660
Location: Rhode island

2001 Dodge Neon ES

Post: #2   PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Under 3K there is a performance improvement as well as the top end if running off an R/T pcm.

Something thats kind of hard to duplicate however if running a window switch.

Runners open up to 3K rpm if WOT then close, then reopen at 5200 rpm

I suspect this is to aid in leaning the a/f at WOT from Idle to 3K seeing as these cars run a bit rich from the hole.

IME personally from running both intakes with a working 02 R/T pcm ( pulls most timing )

Current Mods
ported stock head non magnum
R/T stock exhaust including cat( looks cool but otherwise pointless )
Ported Magnum intake
60mm tb
02 r/t pcm
3.94 LSD trans with centerforce stage 3

Plastic intake + more torque on the low RPM range falls on its face at 5800ish which is counter productive to having a cam.

Magnum intake slight loss of torque and some low rpm bogging with greatly improved top end on an otherwise stock engine.

I'd muster a guess that in my case I'm getting plenty of air in and not enough out atm ( stock head exh ports creating bottleneck ) which could explain the "flat spot"

Most notable is fuel mileage will decrease. Don't expect miracles however.

This is just butt dyno and personal experience, can't dyno/tune till I fix my msd distach driver so I can tune with my apex and even then won't bother till other engine goes in.

Best thing to do is just try. IIRC a ported stock alum first gen intake with the 90 removed is a great performing alternative.

No single mod will make much difference but the right combo of mods that compliment each other can make a significant improvement.

I'm playing with fine tuning exhaust backpressure at the moment with noticeable gains and losses.
If the parts car is cleaner rust wise than your car, swap the inner dash panels (VIN) and use the parts car with your title.

But don't street race..!!??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
2009 Gold Contributor

Age: 31
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 3165
Location: Austin, Tx

2002 Dodge Neon SE

Post: #3   PostPosted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It will change your intake sound somewhat as well. The plastic intake seemed to have more resonance.
Old Neon Log | Feedback

2000 - Corvette Coupe
2002 - Neon SE Fully Built (scrapped)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
occasional demons
Mr One World

Age: 52
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 19840
Location: Ashland, Ohio

2001 Dodge Neon ES

Post: #4   PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 1gn plastic IM has been dyno proven to make more overall power than the Magnum IM. There is a thread on it somewhere.

The Magnum IM is also much heavier than the plastic IM. If only they had made it from plastic...

After seeing the dyno results, I have lost most of my ambition to install the Magnum IM over my Ghetto Blaster 1gn full length runner manifold. I have a strong feeling the Mag IM will be a downgrade.

At least with a 60mm TB on either. With the stock TB, possibly the Magnum might have the advantage. But once you get the feel for a 60mm TB, there is no satisfaction in going back to stock.

2001 neon ES MTX with '02 R/T PCM
1999 neon 2.4 EDZ MTX
Help support 2GN!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    2GN.ORG Forum Index -> Naturally Aspirated All times are UTC - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by p h p B B © 2001, 2005 p h p B B Group
2GN.org Decals