Which year is better

Have a question that your not sure what category it fits into or isn't really a specific question about a specific part? Ask it here...
Post Reply
evilneon02
2GN Member
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: NC
Contact:

Which year is better

Post by evilneon02 » Thu Aug 09, 2018 8:32 pm

Hello which year is the better motor to have the 03, 04, 05 srt4

Midnight_Rider
2014 Platinum Contributor
Posts: 7922
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:49 am
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: Which year is better

Post by Midnight_Rider » Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:38 pm

I have always heard that the 2004 is best... but why I don't know. I'll let someone more knowledgeable explain. :D
Official "I'm Going To Drive My Neon 'til It Dies" Club #10

User avatar
jonnymopar
Junior Admin
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:49 pm
Location: Southeastern MA

Re: Which year is better

Post by jonnymopar » Fri Aug 10, 2018 8:16 am

Are you asking just about the bare engine? If so, the injectors are the only difference between those years. The 2003 had smaller injectors. The 2004 and 2005 had "Stage 1" injectors which were slightly larger.

There are several other differences at the car level, but that's the only difference at the engine level.
Image
Jon J.

2003 Neon SXT - 217,900 miles... return-to-stock initiated... the day approaches...
1989 Daytona ES - 2.4L/A555 swapped

occasional demons
Junior Admin
Posts: 19178
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:14 pm
Location: Ashland Ohio

Re: Which year is better

Post by occasional demons » Fri Aug 10, 2018 12:58 pm

Strictly referring to the engine, injectors aside, 2003 to 2010 2.4 blocks are all cast the same, of course N/A and a boosted bottom ends being different, and some holes not bored or drilled/tapped. But any 2003 to 2010 block can be made into a turbo block with a bit of added machine work.

Some early turbo 2.4's had a forged crank, but finding one of those might be tough. And really, unless you have a large budget, you're not going to need it, as the following cast crank versions have pretty well proven themselves.

The 2002 and earlier heads flowed better in stock form though. But for stock oem purposes, adding boost made that negligible.
Bill
dblsg wrote:ya'll a bunch of post whores
epic

2001 Neon ES MTX with '02 R/T PCM
Help support 2GN!

rondert
n00b
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:03 pm

Re: Which year is better

Post by rondert » Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:51 am

Another vote for 04. I know some guys who own one and haven't heard any complaints from them.

occasional demons
Junior Admin
Posts: 19178
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:14 pm
Location: Ashland Ohio

Re: Which year is better

Post by occasional demons » Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:36 pm

If you're looking for just a donor engine, any year from a boosted neon, or PT Cruiser will be equal. They are all the same.

A post 2005 PT engine might have the potential advantage of having less mileage, being newer.
Bill
dblsg wrote:ya'll a bunch of post whores
epic

2001 Neon ES MTX with '02 R/T PCM
Help support 2GN!

occasional demons
Junior Admin
Posts: 19178
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:14 pm
Location: Ashland Ohio

Re: Which year is better

Post by occasional demons » Mon Nov 26, 2018 7:42 am

rondert wrote:
Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:51 am
Another vote for 04. I know some guys who own one and haven't heard any complaints from them.

So just how many SRT-4's are there in the Philippines?
Bill
dblsg wrote:ya'll a bunch of post whores
epic

2001 Neon ES MTX with '02 R/T PCM
Help support 2GN!

Post Reply

Return to “General 2nd Gen Discussion”