Page 4 of 4

Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:05 pm
by blue demon02
Dude that motor should be dropped into a car as is and dynoed to see what it makes with the prototype intake.

Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:05 pm
by 1972demon
Canada won't give up the prototype manifold , me and my dad were looking at the cam last night , we have a feeling its been re-ground

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:37 pm
by charger440neon2.0l
maybe that was a generic part number at the time of testing. That cam could be the reason for chrysler to go with that cam from 96-05 or could be the reason for the differant cam in the r/t
Be sure to measure lift and duration.

If it has a smaller base circle be sure and measure valve stem height before using another cam.

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:35 pm
by 1972demon
TOO LATE

Will update with picturew when I get a chance

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:05 am
by BlackRoseRacing
1972demon wrote:TOO LATE

Will update with picturew when I get a chance
:rockon: