The "forgotten" Dart
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:36 pm
Another example of great Chrysler engineering.
Man, i so want a 71-74 Dart/Demon/Duster
2GN.ORG
The best source for the Second Generation Neon - Period.
https://forum.2gn.org/
The "forgotten" Dart
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:28 pm
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:48 pm
Yummm!
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:17 pm
pretty cool,,, the 61 dart looks alot like my 62 lancer... good stuff
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:00 pm
^^^^ the Sport body owns all! [Not that I hate the standard body.]EclecticBlue wrote:
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:52 am
69' GT was my second car. Transplanted 383 4bbl, headers to h pipe to Dynomax Turbos, POSI, automatic for the easy scores on dates.....
My brother wrapped it around a parking lot pole doing donuts.
My brother wrapped it around a parking lot pole doing donuts.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:58 am
My buddy used to have a 340 Duster with a factory sunroof. Hand crank. Kinda like a mid 80's Golf used to have. I guess less than 75 were made that year with a sunroof. It was cool.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:31 am
I miss my dads 75 slant six Dart. I was so young, but I still remember the bench seats.... :sigh:
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:48 am
I wanted a Duster 340 soooo bad when I was a kid. I think that this is why I like my SRT so much; it is like an '05 version of the Dart/Demon/Duster to me. Maybe others won't see that but this is what I think. 
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:45 pm
this is part of the reason that 30 - 35 mpg for todays cars is rediculous:
"The 145-horsepower Slant Six delivered 24.74 miles per gallon in the 1960 2,061-mile Mobilgas Economy Run"
and
"The 318-cubic-inch V-8 with two-barrel carburetor pushed out 230 horsepower (gross) and, in the 1960 Economy Run, recorded 22.29 miles per gallon with an automatic transmission."
36 to 40 in my neon is a good day. so in 46 years we doubled our fuel economy with all this technology we have.
anyways. they are some really nice cars.
and i understand where you are coming from david. i may only be 21 but i understand.
"The 145-horsepower Slant Six delivered 24.74 miles per gallon in the 1960 2,061-mile Mobilgas Economy Run"
and
"The 318-cubic-inch V-8 with two-barrel carburetor pushed out 230 horsepower (gross) and, in the 1960 Economy Run, recorded 22.29 miles per gallon with an automatic transmission."
36 to 40 in my neon is a good day. so in 46 years we doubled our fuel economy with all this technology we have.
anyways. they are some really nice cars.
and i understand where you are coming from david. i may only be 21 but i understand.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:35 pm
Thanks!racer12306 wrote:i may only be 21 but i understand.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:39 pm
Midnight_Rider wrote:I wanted a Duster 340 soooo bad when I was a kid. I think that this is why I like my SRT so much; it is like an '05 version of the Dart/Demon/Duster to me. Maybe others won't see that but this is what I think.
same for me, but I still am a kid
I like the fact that I have the mopar heritage of the R/T and magnum nameplates.Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:05 pm
