new Dodge Avenger = baby Dodge Charger...

Pretty much what the title says, all off-topic related posts can be posted here to share with everyone.
User avatar
Diablo0
2GN.org Owner/Admin
Posts: 12574
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:20 pm
Location: Greenville, SC
Contact:

Post by Diablo0 » Thu Nov 16, 2006 2:55 am

Picked up the Automobile magazine and they did a short little write-up on the Avenger basically saying they just about hate every design aspect of it :lol: Just throught I'd toss that in here after reading it lol.
Manufactures have long made the habit of showing lightly disguised production cars as "concepts," but rarely have such a teaser been as completely depressing as the Dodge Avenger presented at Paris. Even if the show car's bad fits, poor paint, and seemingly careless assembly are not repeated on the production cars, it's bad enough that every design feature will be.

The hapless young designer who was sent to Paris to talk about it, Ryan Nagode, 25, has all the trendy designer jargon down pat - headlights are no just lamps, they're "round burners" - not much of what the had to say was pure PR BS. TO insist that the Avenger embodies "Dodge attitude," whatever that may be, and that the bland, banal, and exceedingly ordinary Avenger shape is defined by "powerful cues" is just plain silly. If the awkward rear fender indication starting on the rear door, Charger style, or the SUV-like extensions around the wheel openings are powerful cues, then tehre is little hope for Dodge in the future.

Leave the propaganda aside, and what you have is a chunky, even brutal shape that Chrysler seems to think says "American style" to Europeans, who are expected - by Dodge - to buy this car in large numbers. We doubt that. In Europe it can only be a marginal niche product, and the fact that it is a three-box shape in a market where hatchbacks are style of choice means that it faces an uphill struggle from the start.

The upper body structure profile is actually quite nice, although the side glass line is marred by a black-out panel at the rear point, but i is out of proportion with the rest of the car. The body sides are rather flat, with a big indent at the bottom of the doors intended to minimize their excessive height. Each corner of the car is a blocky volume, with the center of the front and rear bumpers inset, the result being that the car seems narrower than it s. Starting from scratch, they could have made this a good-looking car, buy they missed completely, giving us a hodgepodge of unresolved and unrrelated lines and surfaces.
-Jason
Black '02 Neon R/T | White '02 Neon R/T - SRT-4 Engine Swap
Image
^^^ no, that isn't what I look like haha
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value. - Albert Einstein

Midnight_Rider
2014 Platinum Contributor
Posts: 8452
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:49 am
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Post by Midnight_Rider » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:07 am

supertrick_05 wrote:I just think it's stupid to bring out a brand new car that looks identical to the Charger.
This reminds me of when I was taking delivery of my '87 Omni and the dealership had a Shadow on the sales floor (the first one that I had seen). I remember thinking, "It looks like a baby (Dodge) Lancer." Maybe Dodge should have called this a Coronet (I loved those!) and made the Charger a proper two-door.
Official "I'm Going To Drive My Neon 'til It Dies" Club #10

Mr Josh Zombie
2010 Platinum Contributor
Posts: 8357
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: Toledo, OH

Post by Mr Josh Zombie » Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:49 am

The funny thing about it all is though... people will buy it.

Just because DCx fans don't support it, the main population will.

Effing consumers....
Modify your Car • Modify your Body • Modify your Life

titansxt
2GN Member
Posts: 2848
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:24 am
Location: IL

Post by titansxt » Thu Nov 16, 2006 2:25 pm

Opi wrote:The funny thing about it all is though... people will buy it.

Just because DCx fans don't support it, the main population will.

Effing consumers....
Everyone thinks DCX is sooo trendy. Every car they put out is "hip" and "cool" even it it does look like shit.
Image
2003 SXT
2005 SRT-4
2gn.org member #26 :tard:
Lemon Neon member #1.
Any or all of the above statement(s) may be entirely fictional and a fabrication. :lol:
ram50rocket wrote: I must had been mistaken in thinking that NEONS.ORG was just for neons.

User avatar
Rapley
2GN Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Kincardine ON, Canada

Post by Rapley » Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:18 pm

i honestly don't think it looks that bad. And for all the people saying "come out with something original looking", well yes, it does look somewhat like other cars Dodge has made, but car companies do that. They use styling cues throughout a car line-up. Dodge uses a boxy (or as they like to call it "muscular" look), with sharp edges, and of course the 'crosshair' on the front.

If you look at the pictures, yes they look similar, but they still look like good looking cars.

Image
Image

Image

Image
Image
Image
01 LX: Patriot blue, MTX, lowered, CAI, bronze snowflakes - RIP :(
97 Neon: 2 tone (flatblack/white) MTX, DOHC, 2 door, bronze snowflakes

scneonchic
2GN Veteran
Posts: 8884
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:44 am
Location: Aiken, SC

Post by scneonchic » Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:37 pm

Too bad they are made so cheaply....I had a charger se as a loaner, brand new off the lot 06 (when I had the caliber in for work) and It was a nice looking car, drove nice, but the interior felt cheap, esp the dash and door panels. Same thing I noticed w/ the caliber and the dakota trucks.

J8t4m
2GN Member
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:25 pm
Location: Indy - IN

Post by J8t4m » Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:29 pm

scneonchic wrote:Too bad they are made so cheaply....I had a charger se as a loaner, brand new off the lot 06 (when I had the caliber in for work) and It was a nice looking car, drove nice, but the interior felt cheap, esp the dash and door panels. Same thing I noticed w/ the caliber and the dakota trucks.
sit in a new GM - wanna talk about CHEAP interior . . . man dodge puts them to shame compared

out of the americans companies- ford and dodge have decent interiors
2K4 E-Blue SRT | 2K4 Red SRT (SOLD) | 2k2 White R/T (SOLD) | 2k3 Blaze Red SXT *RIP*
Image
"Everything seems tempting, But nothing comes for free...
I often wonder how you drive, when the roads too dark to see..." - LOST PROPHETS

dyingtolive15
n00b
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: NY

Post by dyingtolive15 » Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:19 pm

Model :

R/T


Drive :

Front Wheel Drive


Engine :

3.5L Engine V6 ATX (R/T Only)

hahaha only 3.5 v6 on the R/T and its FWD thats just awful

nothing compared to charger r/t RWD and 5.7 V8

THAT THING IS HIDEOUS
Don't Let Life Pass You By

User avatar
MyNeonSaysHi
2GN Veteran
Posts: 11898
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Kansas

Post by MyNeonSaysHi » Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:23 am

I will take a stone white one please. (If it was free of course)

08 Acura TL-S
05 Neon SRT-4

User avatar
Diablo0
2GN.org Owner/Admin
Posts: 12574
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:20 pm
Location: Greenville, SC
Contact:

Post by Diablo0 » Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:18 am

If you go take the survey thing on the Dodge site you can give your input on what options it should have and engine... like a turbo charged 300hp engine matched to a 6-speed MTX....

http://www.dodge.com/en/avenger/build-price/index.html
-Jason
Black '02 Neon R/T | White '02 Neon R/T - SRT-4 Engine Swap
Image
^^^ no, that isn't what I look like haha
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value. - Albert Einstein

User avatar
MyNeonSaysHi
2GN Veteran
Posts: 11898
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Kansas

Post by MyNeonSaysHi » Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:39 am

Diablo0 wrote:If you go take the survey thing on the Dodge site you can give your input on what options it should have and engine... like a turbo charged 300hp engine matched to a 6-speed MTX....

http://www.dodge.com/en/avenger/build-price/index.html
YEssss! Only $1,250 more too.

They offer a white one too! It looks sick! I am actually starting to like these things. If they offer a 300hp 6 speed I would look for one in the future.

08 Acura TL-S
05 Neon SRT-4

User avatar
Diablo0
2GN.org Owner/Admin
Posts: 12574
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:20 pm
Location: Greenville, SC
Contact:

Post by Diablo0 » Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:18 am

Just give make sure you select that as being interested so it show's them that there is a market out there and that is what people want. They did the same thing at Mopar Nats asking people what they wanted in the Challenger such as LSD, 6-speed, wheels, colors, it was quite the list :lol:
-Jason
Black '02 Neon R/T | White '02 Neon R/T - SRT-4 Engine Swap
Image
^^^ no, that isn't what I look like haha
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value. - Albert Einstein

Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”