time to invade clubRSX.com

bad04srt · Post by **bad04srt** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:58 pm

J-Villa wrote:by saying it's a nicer car ect isn't saying it's faster, anyone with common sense knows a srt is faster than a rsx-s....

but i bet the honda will run twice as long as the srt4 haha

doubt it.....anyone who drives their rsx relatively hard will blow the motor much faster than an srt....my friends k20 exploded when he missed a gear and it revved to 12k....honda motors dont blow.....they explode....we found piston in the tb, part of the rod in the head, and the sleeve was destroyed....but the vtec was intact lol

esteinmaier · Post by **esteinmaier** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:03 pm

bad01neon wrote:srt-4>rsx>regular neon

my buddies rsx on kpro got stomped by our friends srt hands down

I would have to say it's better like this:

Turbo Neon>Stock SRT4>RSX>Stock Neon

SILVER-ES · Post by **SILVER-ES** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:40 pm

Even if you were to "invade" for some reason look at the number of members.

85,405 > 1797

That's a ratio of roughly 47:1, good luck with that.

Post by **racer12306** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:52 pm

^^^

even with the neons.org crew they still got the neon crowd out numbers about 5:1

add in the entire srtforums and they still got the neon crowd outnumbered. remember that is all of srt forums, not just the srt-4 crowd. also a lot of the members between neons.org, 2gn and srtforums are repeats.

sullygully · Post by **sullygully** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:01 pm

I had a buddy that blew his engine on his 2002 civic, cuz his oil pump crapped out on him. $5000 later and he was up a running. I sit in a Honda, and for the price they sell at, it seems very cheaply built. At least with the neon you get what you pay for

refect · Post by **refect** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:32 pm

uummmmm.........my friends pretty much stock rxs beats slightly modded evos and srt4s...he is gonna be turbo real real soon too. should be interesting.

Panhead · Post by **Panhead** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:36 pm

refect wrote:uummmmm.........my friends pretty much stock rxs beats slightly modded evos and srt4s...he is gonna be turbo real real soon too. should be interesting.

stock for stock (both cars rsx and srt4), the srt4 was faster. car and driver even stated that the srt4 was faster than the rsx in there test. not bragging, just stating the facts.

*edit*

the way i heard how they compare cars is by the price, not because its turbo'd. the rsx puts about 170ish stock? srt4 230ish...

refect · Post by **refect** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:50 pm

^^^ im sure facts will say that, but with different drivers the facts change. im not saying that car and driver lied to you or anything, because im sure the srt4 is faster than the rsx. i mean come on its turbo vs. n/a, the srt4 has more power, and they both weigh some what the same (rsx probably has a little more weight advantage)so of course you know whats gonna happen. im not saying he is either a really good driver or the drivers he raced were shitty at driving either, but i been in the car with him when he raced evos and seen him race srt4s. he will either pull on them or be like 2 cars or so behind just chillin and not really getting pulled on any worse. all he has is intake and exhaust on his type s too. shit he ran beside me when i raced my friends built k20 hatch.....i look over and the rsx is right at my back wheel till around top of 3rd when i was up ahead of both of them. i was running 20psi spike holding 17 and falling off to about 15 as it got closer to redline...all untuned. im sure tuned would of been no competition, but still just saying the rsx is an overall awesome car and thats pretty impressive for just having intake and exhaust.