Page 1 of 2

Cobalt SS finally brings some heat

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:59 am
by deep1ca
Srt4 VS turbo cobalt SS.

You srt4 guys look out for those new cobalts.

They now come strapped with a turbo and stock 260hp.

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/28/offi ... s-at-sema/

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:43 am
by Midnight_Rider
I actually considered a Cobalt when my car was (briefly) up for sale. Pretty high praise for a GM product if I looked at it. Off-topic but your post made me think of this. This new one looks pretty hot- really think that DCX missed the boat on the Caliber :roll: "SRT-4" (the car was in the works before Chrysler was on it's own so you can't blame the Americans for that piece of crap).

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:30 am
by boostinss
to bad it isnt released till late next year...

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:25 am
by ZeroChad
:drunk: Yeah we found out about a month ago at SAE.

The exterior is not too bad. The only parts I don't like are the wheels and rear lip. I've heard good things about the GXP engine, so we'll see how she does. I'm rooting for it.

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:45 am
by Crashin
05neonsxt wrote:to bad it isnt released till late next year...
That's perfect for me, that's when I'll be looking for a new car. I like the looks, I never really noticed the Cobalts before.

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:59 am
by J-Villa
repost and it still looks ugly lol

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:49 am
by MoxHair
J-Villa wrote:repost and it still looks ugly lol
I still think it looks better than the caliber.. Which isn't saying much

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:06 pm
by J-Villa
they are both ugly but i would rather take the caliber over the cobalt

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:40 pm
by occasional demons
I'm sure it won't be cheap, so if I was spending the $ I would leave the sport compacts and go with a Charger or Challenger. As far as new cars...





Now if they would just resurrsect Plymouth and build 'Cudas :rockon:

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:48 pm
by MoxHair
J-Villa wrote:they are both ugly but i would rather take the caliber over the cobalt
I'd take the lighter of the two cars.

But I won't buy either.

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:05 pm
by oklamopar
260 HP. Now is that bhp or crankshaft hp?
srt-4 neon is rated bhp (at the wheels).
just curious.

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:16 pm
by hansken_yo
that has got to be crank... no one ever really advertises at the wheel. and SRT's i believe run 230 at the wheel (250 at the crank) something like that.

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:25 pm
by occasional demons
:withstupid:

BHP is basically HP/Torque measured at the crank with a water brake. (dyno basically) Not sure if it is the same as gross or net though. Net being with all the driven accessories running @ the crank. Gross with nothing being driven by the crank. I think all figures given these days is net hp. Pre '71 was gross. That's why in the Chilton's Manuals the hp ratings took a big dump in '71. the power output wasn't really that big of a loss, just measured in a different way. But it did steadily decline as emmisions took their toll on '60's technology.

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:33 am
by BlackRoseRacing
Image

Image

The scary part is the SS looks so close to the New World Engine that the 08 SRT is using......less the engine cover...

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:15 pm
by aperson
Too much going on in the cobalt engine bay to me. And the SRT pic looks like it's air cooled with all the covers.

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:25 pm
by kc2005ptgt
Sorry, but I like the cobalt, always have, always will.. two door, fwd, now 260hp TC? :D I like the looks as well, but not in yellow, thanks - black. :D

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:30 pm
by racer12306
There's a rad cap right there next to the boost pipe.

Isn't there a lot going on in the SRT engine bay too?

I do like the new Cobalt SS. Good power and 2 door, for people that want a sporty 2 door.

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:24 pm
by rOniN
^^sporty two door would be a challenger :) I'm hopeing to get my hands on one when they make the 6 speed.

Cobalts could be good with the turbo. I'm not a fan but that's ok...

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:05 pm
by grambo
My God, what a concept that GM has come up with...wow...like five years after Chrysler did it. Wow..impressive...Oh wait, didn't Chrysler's design chiefe go over to Chevy a few years back? Hmm...neat how they redo everything he did at Chrysler....psshsshshsh...lame...

No thanks. Why can't Chevy actually come up with something on their own instead of making clones of every other car company's ideas... :thefinger:

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:21 pm
by Arro
You can complain all you want, but DC has pretty much stopped producing performance trims for sport compacts. Hell, they pretty much stopped producing sport compacts. There is nothing in their lineup now to compete with cars like the Cobalt or the Civic or the Mazda 3 or the Focus. The Avenger is a bit bigger, and the Caliber is... well, it's the Caliber :lol:

Anyways DC uses "performance" more as a bling factor for guys who want to say they have an "SRT" or "R/T"... the emphasis isn't truely on performance anymore, the performance just comes as a byproduct.

So what if Chevy did this... where you criticize, I say "better late than never".

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:21 pm
by racer12306
Hey, maybe now they will put a cummins in their trucks.

I know I would be buying a Chevy Diesel thats for sure. Employee discount FTW

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:34 pm
by Mr Josh Zombie
kc2002acr wrote:Sorry, but I like the cobalt, always have, always will.. two door, fwd, now 260hp TC? :D I like the looks as well, but not in yellow, thanks - black. :D
:withstupid:

only reason i don't own a cobalt right now is because i couldn't afford it around the time i bought my neon.


Fully loaded, black on black = sex. pure sex.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:12 pm
by Arro
BlackRoseRacing wrote:Image

Image

The scary part is the SS looks so close to the New World Engine that the 08 SRT is using......less the engine cover...

Just re-read this... why did you say that? The manifolds are completely reversed from each other, because Chrysler loves to stuff their turbos in the rear, and everyone else makes the tuner's job easier by putting them in the front :P

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:49 pm
by grambo
Arro wrote:You can complain all you want, but DC has pretty much stopped producing performance trims for sport compacts. Hell, they pretty much stopped producing sport compacts. There is nothing in their lineup now to compete with cars like the Cobalt or the Civic or the Mazda 3 or the Focus. The Avenger is a bit bigger, and the Caliber is... well, it's the Caliber :lol:

Anyways DC uses "performance" more as a bling factor for guys who want to say they have an "SRT" or "R/T"... the emphasis isn't truely on performance anymore, the performance just comes as a byproduct.

So what if Chevy did this... where you criticize, I say "better late than never".
Your right about the performance trims. They were mostly a joke, save the 04'+ SRT-4 and the 80's Shelby badged units.
I say, instead of spending all that effort polishing a turd, why not build a true performance machine from the ground up? They have the capability, they have the designers, and they have the $$$.
Why make 19 cars for five companies on the same platform? Just make one, super-badas* sport-compact car and be done with it? I mean, these guys build the C6....they can innovate when they need to. Shoot, put the damn thing on the Zeta platform and put the effort into it they did with the Sky and Solstice and then watch what they could do... :thumbup:

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:18 pm
by Arro
Because performance "trim" gives buyers a package they can apply to an affordable vehicle, while yielding reasonably good performance improvements. The key here is price. That was the point behind all the turbo Chryslers of the 80's (both Shelbys and regular Chrysler-badged turbocharged cars), and it remains true today.

That's why you get a four door Integra sold alongside of a GS-R or Type-R. That's why you get a 2Gn sold alongside of an SRT-4 (or DID, thanks a bunch DC for forsaking us at present), that's why you get Focus in a wagon as well as a hatch and a coupe.

From the ground up would mean a cost passed along to the consumer that few would be willing (or able) to spend on.

Performance trims for existing affordable car platforms not only makes more sense in terms of car sales, it helps flood the aftermarket industry with owners of these vehicles, who bought these affordable alternatives and have the spare cash to spend on aftermarket parts. This means the aftermarket industry is more likely to develop options for these cars. Even some extreme options.

It just makes sense for everyone. It's the sport compact car market (especially the performance trim packages) that have allowed the middle-class guy (and even sometimes the poor dude) to enjoy the excitement, and even sometimes produce rides that rival the performance of more purpose-built sportscars.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:32 pm
by OB
My buddy (he lurks here sometimes) wants to trade is SSS for the new turbo one (SST?). That thing sounds like its gonna be quick as hell. Should be a contender for sure.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:06 pm
by Arro
lol tell your buddy that's like a 2gn SE guy wanting to trade car-for-car for an SRT. Gotta pay to play ;)

Yeah the SSS was something to respect. The new one is gonna rock.

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:06 am
by MoxHair
SS/SC

SS/TC

:)

SST stands for Super Stock Turbo in the SRT world.

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:18 pm
by danman132x
This one is going on my list of cars I want :lol:

Whatever my next car may be in a few years, it MUST be turbocharged.

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:59 pm
by ZeroChad
^^ Same here man. Planning on buying a new/slightly used car after I graduate.

Well either that or ther v-16 quad turbo AWD Limosine that my buddies and I dreamed up.