I think Philly really is rubbing off on me.

sidepipe87 · Post by **sidepipe87** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:21 pm

jrumann59 wrote:
sidepipe87 wrote:
PhillyLS1 wrote: The main asshole drives an is300 so he has nooooo room to talk
Those are underpowered and overweight. Not terrible looking, but they just don't perform that well

goddammit. they moved the thread so noobs can't post in it bc they got too butthurt
Unless you drop a 2JZ motor into them, the 2JZ came as an option for them in Japan. But most IS guys are worse then euro tuners, for some reason they think import luxury cars rule the world. I would rather hang out with honda drivers then IS guys any time.

oh yeah, with a swap like a 2jz or even from a gs 300 they have potential. but you can get potential out of most things with tons of money. I meant in stock form. Also it's funny that it's a luxury car being that it's just a toyota. people have more money than brains

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:27 pm

jrumann59 wrote:
sidepipe87 wrote:
PhillyLS1 wrote: The main asshole drives an is300 so he has nooooo room to talk
Those are underpowered and overweight. Not terrible looking, but they just don't perform that well

goddammit. they moved the thread so noobs can't post in it bc they got too butthurt
Unless you drop a 2JZ motor into them, the 2JZ came as an option for them in Japan. But most IS guys are worse then euro tuners, for some reason they think import luxury cars rule the world. I would rather hang out with honda drivers then IS guys any time.

I don't think this guy has the juice to cover that swap, then the go fast parts, tuning etc etc etc. I could be wrong.

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:20 pm

I got the thread under control the tide is turning in our favor.

jrumann59 · Post by **jrumann59** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:33 pm

sidepipe87 wrote:
jrumann59 wrote:
sidepipe87 wrote: Those are underpowered and overweight. Not terrible looking, but they just don't perform that well

goddammit. they moved the thread so noobs can't post in it bc they got too butthurt
Unless you drop a 2JZ motor into them, the 2JZ came as an option for them in Japan. But most IS guys are worse then euro tuners, for some reason they think import luxury cars rule the world. I would rather hang out with honda drivers then IS guys any time.
oh yeah, with a swap like a 2jz or even from a gs 300 they have potential. but you can get potential out of most things with tons of money. I meant in stock form. Also it's funny that it's a luxury car being that it's just a toyota. people have more money than brains

Yes a direct swap would be costly but it can be done the same way as a 2.4 swap can be srt'd. The block itself is the same as the 2jz and all that needs to be sourced are the internals and the turbo and a few incidentals. Yes it is a Toyota but like many SRT owners they are off in their own fantasy land.

sidepipe87 · Post by **sidepipe87** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:03 pm

jrumann59 wrote: Yes a direct swap would be costly but it can be done the same way as a 2.4 swap can be srt'd. The block itself is the same as the 2jz and all that needs to be sourced are the internals and the turbo and a few incidentals. Yes it is a Toyota but like many SRT owners they are off in their own fantasy land.

ok gotcha haha

Passt · Post by **Passt** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:38 pm

PhillyLS1 wrote:I got the thread under control the tide is turning in our favor.

Post it here. we can't see it anymore.

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:05 am

How quickly they run for cover. Ahhh the power of the LSX.

No in allllll serious. It's over.

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:53 am

PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote: Hey look at that! You recognize what people hear when you speak through projection!
God you're terrible at this.

Yeah, sorry. I was never taught mean-speech.

Post by **Canada** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:34 am

I often having a hard time trying to see the actual point of what Keith says through all the anger, sarcasm and hate. Lol

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:39 am

Canada wrote:I often having a hard time trying to see the actual point of what Keith says through all the anger, sarcasm and hate. Lol

Aw, I wouldn't go that far. He's a nice guy, he just loves to ruffle feathers.

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:39 am

Pocahontas wrote:
PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote: Hey look at that! You recognize what people hear when you speak through projection!
God you're terrible at this.
Yeah, sorry. I was never taught mean-speech.

Backbones are grown, not taught.

Canada, unless I call someone a name... it's not hate or anger. Sarcasm? SURE.
Just because I don't agree with everyone, I choose to stand my ground on my opinion, and I present fact in the face of opinion doesn't make me mean.

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:41 am

PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote:
PhillyLS1 wrote: God you're terrible at this.
Yeah, sorry. I was never taught mean-speech.
Backbones are grown, not taught.

And you've taken it upon yourself to help me grow mine?

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:42 am

Pocahontas wrote:
Canada wrote:I often having a hard time trying to see the actual point of what Keith says through all the anger, sarcasm and hate. Lol
Aw, I wouldn't go that far. He's a nice guy, he just loves to ruffle feathers.

I have a tolerance. I'm a dose of reality. IF feathers get ruffled, then so be it.
I'm straight forward where as you are passive aggressive.

Danteneon · Post by **Danteneon** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:44 am

PhillyLS1 wrote:Canada, unless I call someone a name... it's not hate or anger. Sarcasm? SURE.
Just because I don't agree with everyone, I choose to stand my ground on my opinion, and I present fact in the face of opinion doesn't make me mean.

True. It's the hurtful sounding comments that make you sound mean. Now whether you are or not is another story...

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:44 am

Pocahontas wrote:
PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote: Yeah, sorry. I was never taught mean-speech.
Backbones are grown, not taught.
And you've taken it upon yourself to help me grow mine?

Can't teach an old dog new tricks and I'm not a miracle worker.

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:47 am

PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote:
Canada wrote:I often having a hard time trying to see the actual point of what Keith says through all the anger, sarcasm and hate. Lol
Aw, I wouldn't go that far. He's a nice guy, he just loves to ruffle feathers.
I have a tolerance. I'm a dose of reality. IF feathers get ruffled, then so be it.
I'm straight forward where as you are passive aggressive.

Passive aggresive? When the hell have I shown you passive aggresive?

You know I'm a rational person. When anyone says something that makes sense to me I acknowledge it. What you just said is crap. Plain and simple crap.

PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote:
PhillyLS1 wrote: Backbones are grown, not taught.
And you've taken it upon yourself to help me grow mine?
.... I'm not a miracle worker.

I take that as a compliment.

Post by **racer12306** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:49 am

uh oh, she's starting to get mad.

RUN FOR COVER

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:52 am

racer12306 wrote:uh oh, she's starting to get mad.

RUN FOR COVER

Little ol' scary me, HAH ^_^

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:01 am

Pocahontas wrote: Passive aggresive? When the hell have I shown you passive aggresive?

You criticize people as much as I do. The difference is you talk your way around it. The first time someone does something you don't like you retreat into your head, fold your arms, and make it perfectly clear you're not happy. Instead of talking about it you tap your foot and make faces.

Pocahontas wrote:You know I'm a rational person. When anyone says something that makes sense to me I acknowledge it. What you just said is crap. Plain and simple crap.

OOOOOOHHH "when it makes sense to YOU" So only when it meets your approval? Egomaniac lol.
Maybe I should quote everything out of a book, instead of having an original thought "so it makes sense to you." I'll just add my $0.02 to everything with "Studies have found" and "back in 1882."
Of course it doesn't make sense to ya. That's the difference between being taught and having experience.

Pocahontas wrote:I take that as a compliment.

That's your right.

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:14 am

PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote: Passive aggresive? When the hell have I shown you passive aggresive?
You criticize people as much as I do. The difference is you talk your way around it. The first time someone does something you don't like you retreat into your head, fold your arms, and make it perfectly clear you're not happy. Instead of talking about it you tap your foot and make faces.

I can't claim I don't criticize people. I'm sure I've told people things about them before. That's not being passive aggressive.

When I retreat into my head, I'm thinking about the conversation and trying to work through it to see if I missed something or if I misunderstood something. I don't make faces, this is the only face I have when I'm not smiling. I'm sorry if it's not up to your standards. And the only time I've EVER tapped my foot was when I was recreating a scene from "Legally Blonde."

PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote:You know I'm a rational person. When anyone says something that makes sense to me I acknowledge it. What you just said is crap. Plain and simple crap.
OOOOOOHHH "when it makes sense to YOU" So only when it meets your approval? Egomaniac lol.

It's not just me. It's everyone. A person only accepts something when it makes sense to them.

PhillyLS1 wrote: Maybe I should quote everything out of a book, instead of having an original thought "so it makes sense to you." I'll just add my $0.02 to everything with "Studies have found" and "back in 1882."
Of course it doesn't make sense to ya. That's the difference between being taught and having experience.

"Get off your high horse."

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:49 am

Pocahontas wrote: I can't claim I don't criticize people. I'm sure I've told people things about them before. That's not being passive aggressive.

When I retreat into my head, I'm thinking about the conversation and trying to work through it to see if I missed something or if I misunderstood something. I don't make faces, this is the only face I have when I'm not smiling. I'm sorry if it's not up to your standards. And the only time I've EVER tapped my foot was when I was recreating a scene from "Legally Blonde."

You do make faces. I'm the only one with the balls to tell you. Everyone else just doesn't want to create static. And don't try the self deprecation routine. Starting a sentence with "I'm sorry if" is PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE. Look it up in one of those textbooks you're so fond of. But thank you for proving my point..... again.

Pocahontas wrote: It's not just me. It's everyone. A person only accepts something when it makes sense to them.

There are things beyond your scope of acceptance that you still will not budge on yet you will still argue. That's your id getting in the way

Pocahontas wrote:"Get off your high horse."

Is a horse a marsupial? Wait, why am I asking you?

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:59 am

PhillyLS1 wrote: You do make faces. I'm the only one with the balls to tell you. Everyone else just doesn't want to create static. And don't try the self deprecation routine. Starting a sentence with "I'm sorry if" is PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE. Look it up in one of those textbooks you're so fond of. But thank you for proving my point..... again.

I didn't know I made faces. Since I can't see myself make them I'll take your word for it. About the "I'm sorry...," figured since I've been treating you passive aggressively I should actually start doing it.

PhillyLS1 wrote: Is a horse a marsupial? Wait, why am I asking you?

Hahah. For such a champion of

experience

you sure do rely a lot on learned facts.

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:06 am

Pocahontas wrote: Since I can't see myself make them I'll take your word for it. About the "I'm sorry...," figured since I've been treating you passive aggressively I should actually start doing it.

You were already doing it. But in your mind you weren't. Wow, that easily manipulated huh?

Pocahontas wrote:Hahah. For such a champion of experience you sure do rely a lot on learned facts.

Yeah, sesame street 5th grade facts like what marsupials are.

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:15 am

PhillyLS1 wrote: Wow, that easily manipulated huh?

It's your right to believe what you want.

PhillyLS1 wrote:
Pocahontas wrote:Hahah. For such a champion of experience you sure do rely a lot on learned facts.
Yeah, sesame street 5th grade facts like what marsupials are.

Kids were taught more thoroughly in your day. Moreover, not to blame my school system, but there are a lot of things that weren't taught in my school. I tried to make it out as best as I could. I guess my teacher thought learning math was more important than learning about specific animal categorizations.

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:23 am

Pocahontas wrote:It's your right to believe what you want.

Based upon the evidence presented. Yes.

Pocahontas wrote: Kids were taught more thoroughly in your day. Moreover, not to blame my school system, but there are a lot of things that weren't taught in my school. I tried to make it out as best as I could. I guess my teacher thought learning math was more important than learning about specific animal categorizations.

I didn't know you could fit that many excuses in one paragraph. Trying is not doing.

Passt · Post by **Passt** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:24 am

Let's not do this in my thread.

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:26 am

Passt wrote:Let's not do this in my thread.

Get your old lady under control and there won't be an issue.

Pocahontas · Post by **Pocahontas** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:27 am

Passt wrote:Let's not do this in my thread.

Okay babe.

PhillyLS1 · Post by **PhillyLS1** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:30 am

Pocahontas wrote:Okay babe.

PhillyLS1 wrote: Wow, that easily manipulated huh?

Passt · Post by **Passt** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:50 am

Pocahontas wrote:
Passt wrote:Let's not do this in my thread.
Okay babe.

<3