Well you all posted on Anti-rice...

Bella Lugrossi · Post by **Bella Lugrossi** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:50 am

you sir are rice-o-rama! no, not really. but don't worry, i'd tell you to your face if it was. cuz i'm a bitch like that.

dblsg · Post by **dblsg** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:07 pm

*hiding in the dark*

oh shit, there gonna see my car on my sig

KrackstaR · Post by **KrackstaR** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:09 pm

caustic neon wrote:
SILVER-ES wrote:Actually, I think your car got posted in the anti-rice thread that's in off-topic. Check page 2....

Yea they did but i guess reading is > than anti-rice. Because the thread they got those pics from explained why the car looked like that, and i'm sorry but a wrecked car is not rice. but oh well I doubt very seriously that any one of them would have the balls to call my car rice to my (or any other member on here) face.

Dude you didnt know your not to have an accident thats ricer mentality.....lol J/k

MyNeonSaysHi · Post by **MyNeonSaysHi** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:03 pm

They are all losers, that have nothing better else to do but call anything thats modded on the exterior, "rice"

I think that no one should of replied to that post of Krackstars car from here. It just starts eeenternet drama. All those people do there is flame, thats all they know how to do in life, is flame on the eeenternet.

The dude that made that post and linked Krackstars pictures over to that site just to "be cool" on the eeenternet and get mad respect kudos/points for the eeenternet message board thingy they have there is the dumbest thing evAr.

I love how they make fun of their own second gens and post about how crappy it is etc. Why post in a forum about your car and have a sig when you dislike it? It makes no sense. 2gn.org is for 2gn enthusiasts, not people that talk shit on peoples cars behind their back and don't care aobut their car what-so-ever. I think those two should get the banhammer. :ban:

Its also amazing how they are like, "Who would put so much money into a Neon, and not just buy a 30k car and leave it stock blah blah blah."
Its called being different and not following the grain of everyone else. Crucial and krackstar have raised the limits on what can be done to our cars and have pushed the limits with new ideas and new things that can be done. I solute what they have done and accomplished with the 2nd gen Neon.

LowNSlow · Post by **LowNSlow** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:10 pm

salute o.O

napalm588 · Post by **napalm588** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:19 pm

-CgPeon- wrote:They are all losers, that have nothing better else to do but call anything thats modded on the exterior, "rice"

Sure we have better stuff to do, but that stuff is less fun and requires more work than posting on a internet forum

-CgPeon- wrote: All those people do there is flame, thats all they know how to do in life, is flame on the eeenternet.

Well if you would have ready any of this entire thread, You'd see i havent flamed a single person, And have tried my best to be respectfull to all this site's members, So im not sure where your getting that, unless you just assumed.

-CgPeon- wrote:I love how they make fun of their own second gens and post about how crappy it is etc. Why post in a forum about your car and have a sig when you dislike it? It makes no sense. 2gn.org is for 2gn enthusiasts, not people that talk shit on peoples cars behind their back and don't care aobut their car what-so-ever. I think those two should get the banhammer.

You cant make fun of your own car now?

-CgPeon- wrote: Its also amazing how they are like, "Who would put so much money into a Neon, and not just buy a 30k car and leave it stock blah blah blah."
Its called being different and not following the grain of everyone else. Crucial and krackstar have raised the limits on what can be done to our cars and have pushed the limits with new ideas and new things that can be done. I solute what they have done and accomplished with the 2nd gen Neon.

It's not much much the putting money into a neon, its the fact that the overall practicallity of the car has been taken away as a street car, and a track car, and we find that as rice, because it would fall under the category "show" car.

Bella Lugrossi · Post by **Bella Lugrossi** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:22 pm

well then i guess he wasn't refering to you was he.

it's really sad to see most of those people are just total assholes about it. uncivilized monkeys. they have no respect for anything. and i am thinking they have no respect for themselves either. especially the ones who make fun of thier own car. it's like a cry for attention. "hey look guys, i'm making fun of my car, let's all do it. maybe you'll think i am funny." and just to clarify this isn't directed to those who are civil. so don't twist it up.

Post by **racer12306** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:27 pm

dont see any need for banning anyone. all 3 of them have been reasonable people. just they have different views on things.

they can do whatever the hell they want over on AR, but here they have to follow the rules. and they have.

welchspro · Post by **welchspro** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:33 pm

napalm588 wrote: It's not much much the putting money into a neon, its the fact that the overall practicallity of the car has been taken away as a street car, and a track car, and we find that as rice, because it would fall under the category "show" car.

I still dont understand this mentality that a show car = rice. Is a classic car that never gets driven but is trailered to shows so the owner can show off his car considered rice? Or what about all the cars at international auto shows? you know, those large shows intended to show off next years models? Those cars are considered show cars are they not? Please clarify what a show car is for me?

napalm588 · Post by **napalm588** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:44 pm

welchspro wrote:
napalm588 wrote: It's not much much the putting money into a neon, its the fact that the overall practicallity of the car has been taken away as a street car, and a track car, and we find that as rice, because it would fall under the category "show" car.
I still dont understand this mentality that a show car = rice. Is a classic car that never gets driven but is trailered to shows so the owner can show off his car considered rice? Or what about all the cars at international auto shows? you know, those large shows intended to show off next years models? Those cars are considered show cars are they not? Please clarify what a show car is for me?

The classic cars? They would mostly be stock, or at least have only engine modifications, that would be the reasoning behind that.

And major car companies need to advertise somehow.

welchspro · Post by **welchspro** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:48 pm

but since they are show cars would they be considered rice? They no longer serve a purpose as a mode of transportation, they have been "reduced" to only show status.

Mr Josh Zombie · Post by **Mr Josh Zombie** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:49 pm

Can't we all just drop this shit already? Agree to disagree?

Seriously people. Our board are the ones dragging all of this out even longer. Go look at Anti-Rice! It appears that they've actually manned up and moved on! How about we do the same?

Show the few new members over here that have given US respect, the same respect they've shown.

Bella Lugrossi · Post by **Bella Lugrossi** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:50 pm

ok so mostly stock isn't rice then? so a mostly stock anything would be ok then? what if the classic car looked like this? would it be rice then?

now is this rice? it's not stock.

i'm just trying to get a better understanding.

Mr Josh Zombie · Post by **Mr Josh Zombie** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:52 pm

*walks away*

I give up. I'd love to stab the damn people that started the whole "rice" term. It's a pointless fucking statement that no two people will agree on. The end.

Bella Lugrossi · Post by **Bella Lugrossi** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:52 pm

i was posting that proabaly right as you you posted. i'll conceed opi.

welchspro · Post by **welchspro** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:58 pm

I apologize for dragging things on, I was just trying to get some clarification on the show car thingy...i'm not tryin to start shit or anything...i just figured that since he was here, and i have no interest in joining over there, I could ask.

if we're done with the whole rice topic then i'll leave it alone. sorry bout that.

napalm588 · Post by **napalm588** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:59 pm

Haha Opi, I could go on forever but I'm pretty sure im overstaying my welcome as resident Master debator, So I'm stopping soon

And to answer your post, those modifications give the car practicality at the track, and there are no pointless body modifications, so I would not consider it rice.

And preserving a classic car by not driving it is not taking away the functionality of the car, any day you wanted to you could start the car up and drive it to work, but the owner chooses to preserve it for younger generations to see, but what I should have stated when I said show cars, was the custom ones, not the classics.

blackboi50 · Post by **blackboi50** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:34 pm

Opi wrote:*walks away*

I give up. I'd love to stab the damn people that started the whole "rice" term. It's a pointless fucking statement that no two people will agree on. The end.

yup

.....i already stated all i have too.........and i dont care im a big fucking ricer.....so wha?????

...............1

MyNeonSaysHi · Post by **MyNeonSaysHi** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:40 pm

napalm588 wrote:
-CgPeon- wrote:They are all losers, that have nothing better else to do but call anything thats modded on the exterior, "rice"
Sure we have better stuff to do, but that stuff is less fun and requires more work than posting on a internet forum

-CgPeon- wrote: All those people do there is flame, thats all they know how to do in life, is flame on the eeenternet.
Well if you would have ready any of this entire thread, You'd see i havent flamed a single person, And have tried my best to be respectfull to all this site's members, So im not sure where your getting that, unless you just assumed.

-CgPeon- wrote:I love how they make fun of their own second gens and post about how crappy it is etc. Why post in a forum about your car and have a sig when you dislike it? It makes no sense. 2gn.org is for 2gn enthusiasts, not people that talk shit on peoples cars behind their back and don't care aobut their car what-so-ever. I think those two should get the banhammer.
You cant make fun of your own car now?

-CgPeon- wrote: Its also amazing how they are like, "Who would put so much money into a Neon, and not just buy a 30k car and leave it stock blah blah blah."
Its called being different and not following the grain of everyone else. Crucial and krackstar have raised the limits on what can be done to our cars and have pushed the limits with new ideas and new things that can be done. I solute what they have done and accomplished with the 2nd gen Neon.
It's not much much the putting money into a neon, its the fact that the overall practicallity of the car has been taken away as a street car, and a track car, and we find that as rice, because it would fall under the category "show" car.

I wasn't directing that post towards you buddy. I was directing it towards the two Neon guys that belong to that forum.
So basically any "show" car is considered rice?

KrackstaR · Post by **KrackstaR** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:44 pm

napalm588 wrote:Haha Opi, I could go on forever but I'm pretty sure im overstaying my welcome as resident Master debator, So I'm stopping soon

And to answer your post, those modifications give the car practicality at the track, and there are no pointless body modifications, so I would not consider it rice.

And preserving a classic car by not driving it is not taking away the functionality of the car, any day you wanted to you could start the car up and drive it to work, but the owner chooses to preserve it for younger generations to see, but what I should have stated when I said show cars, was the custom ones, not the classics.

The classic she posted had different pedals that acts the same as stock and it had other mods that make the car look good, the point I see people make is that its not fair to say that car is functional just because its a classic, some of us feel the same way about our neon's than a person owning a 55 Chevy something. Me personally I don't drive my car everyday due to the cops (cause everything in md is illegal even lowering your car) and the worry of people stealing crap, but I do drive my car every other nice day, and when I do drive it I drive it hard.

Like OPI said yall (the three that have joined) have been real upfront and I applaud that even tho comments were made about my car, Like I said before im not sour about what was said im used to that, I just wish the members that joined our forum and asked for help on stuff would have not took pics from here to bash. (its feels two faced) But in all they apologized and everything is kewl. And I welcome you to 2gn.org home of the best damn car enthusiasts I have ever met.

mztykal · Post by **mztykal** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:49 pm

Wow, I don't even feel like reading the whole thread so if I make some stupid comment, disregard it...

BUT...

Your Civic is kinda ricey. Bright paint job that doesn't help your ET or your lap time at all. Fake rims that might crack when taking a turn on the track. You never posted your suspension, so I'm assuming they're either generic, or the typical Honda, GC and Koni combo. Or maybe even Tokiko Blues...

Post up your ENTIRE mods list along with the block stamp on your motor. For all we know you could have just a plain jane B16a1 or a2. Also what kinda program are you using to "street tune"...

If it's not Crome, Uberdata, Hondata, AEM EMS, etc. then it's not really tuning if it's not a full prog. If you're also running a E-Bay "spoon" chip, that's not tuning. You need to go get a EepRom burner and Crome and do it yourself.

Complete mods list on the pea green Civic.

crowd00control · Post by **crowd00control** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:42 pm

isn't there a riced out blue mustang on this site? What a hunk of junk.

napalm588 · Post by **napalm588** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:02 pm

mztykal wrote:Wow, I don't even feel like reading the whole thread so if I make some stupid comment, disregard it...

BUT...

Your Civic is kinda ricey. Bright paint job that doesn't help your ET or your lap time at all. Fake rims that might crack when taking a turn on the track. You never posted your suspension, so I'm assuming they're either generic, or the typical Honda, GC and Koni combo. Or maybe even Tokiko Blues...

Post up your ENTIRE mods list along with the block stamp on your motor. For all we know you could have just a plain jane B16a1 or a2. Also what kinda program are you using to "street tune"...

If it's not Crome, Uberdata, Hondata, AEM EMS, etc. then it's not really tuning if it's not a full prog. If you're also running a E-Bay "spoon" chip, that's not tuning. You need to go get a EepRom burner and Crome and do it yourself.

Complete mods list on the pea green Civic.

A skunk2 theme was done basically with the whole car with the previous owners, suspension would be skunk2 (pro S?) full coilovers, I think i remember him saying something like 900-1000 dollars for them, but the suspension was not really my focus, as all I really wanted out of this car was a quick daily driver.

Paint job was also not done by me, of course in the sun it looks pretty bright, but It isnt any brighter than the midori green civics running around. Although I thank you for the kind compliments on the paint!

The paint might fit your definition of rice but it deff does not fit mine, it both serves a purpose and does not affect the car in any way.

Full engine mod's list was posted a little into the thread, too lazy to find it but you can if you'd like, but aside that It's got 10 inch break rotors in the front, and rear GSR in the back, and that's pretty much it, as its pretty much stock.

The rims are knockoffs but they are not cheap, and are very durable, Been using them for 3 years now, and no "Chips" when taking a turn, You dont need to spend rediculous prices on name brand rims when you have a buildup on a budget, besides these weighed less than my cousins spoon 15's.

As for the engine block I'd love to take a quick picture with my cell phone for you when I get home from work.

Thanks for the compliments

mztykal · Post by **mztykal** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:19 pm

I had Spoons, there's no way the same size Rota's weigh less. And they are cheap rims. I've also had Slipstreams and last I checked there was a 1-2lb diff per rim.

So you're hating on peoples own style of car, that they created and put thought into.

You bought your car like that, almost exact, sans rims and you're hating on people who put effort into their own rides? Wow...

Bought not built and has a "i pick on ricers" site. Sheesh...

And that paint job serves just as much purpose as airbags on his showcar does. Your paint keeps your Honda from rusting, and his bags help him lift his car to get it onto a lift or to drive it home without cracking the kit. So how is it rice?

Damn you have no right to hate or comment on anyone after you said you bought your car as is. Then threw Rotas on it. And I never said they'd chip as any rim can chip. But I've seen Rotas CRACK on the track. Never saw Spoons crack off the lip. Oh well.

Your Rotas are just as good as 2k Spoon SW388's. LOL!

EDIT, just to make it fair, here's my last Honda...

Mods list (everything done by me, except engine tuning)...

B16a2, B16a2 trans with Exedy Stg 2 clutch and ProStreet lightened flywheel, DC 4-1 header, 2.5" piping no cat, Mugen Twinloop exhaust, AEM short ram intake, B16b cams, Uberdata tuned, CTR front lip, headlights, mirrors, rear lip, wing, grill, SI gauge cluster, Type-R front seats, stripped back half, Autopower 4-pt cage, 17" Gramlight 57pro's (not on car, didn't get a chance to put it on, sold car), JIC suspension (full coilovers), Blox rear LCA, complete Grand Prix White paintjob done by me.

So is my Civic "rice"? It has a wing and a kit on it. 17" rims, and a/c and a stripped back half in a daily driver. It also clocked a 13.6 1/4 mile.

I'm assuming by your definitions it's rice, because the wing and kit serve no purpose, nor do the rims.

napalm588 · Post by **napalm588** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:33 pm

Who said they were rotos? You assumed, just as you assumed I was hating on other peoples rides?

Stock CTR engine was dropped in when I bought the car, All other engine work was done by me, but thanks for assuming again.

I emplore you, please read at least some of this thread before you comment in it.

mztykal · Post by **mztykal** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:34 pm

Ok so they're not Rota's. You said they were Rota's in your first post. Lemme go find it.

Well the shots with my Rota knockoffs were taken like 12 days ago, No recent engine pics because thats the cleanest its been since I bought it

Um you put Rota in your post, wasn't your first post, but you put that there.

Their Nippon Racing rims, copies of Spoon. Same as the Rotas. They don't weigh less than actual Spoon rims, so don't play it off like they do. Unless your cousin had fat ass tires on it, his rims if they are real are 2lbs less per rim.

napalm588 · Post by **napalm588** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:42 pm

mztykal wrote:Ok so they're not Rota's. You said they were Rota's in your first post. Lemme go find it.

Well the shots with my Rota knockoffs were taken like 12 days ago, No recent engine pics because thats the cleanest its been since I bought it
Um you put Rota in your post, wasn't your first post, but you put that there.

Their Nippon Racing rims, copies of Spoon. Same as the Rotas. They don't weigh less than actual Spoon rims, so don't play it off like they do. Unless your cousin had fat ass tires on it, his rims if they are real are 2lbs less per rim.

I meant a knockoff's of rotors, but now that you say it, it would make more sence to just say spoon knockoffs, but same thing.

I dont know, maybe his were 16''s or something.

702Neon · Post by **702Neon** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:58 pm

KrackstaR wrote:
napalm588 wrote:engine bay 7 months ago.

but every mod on my car has some purpose, or reason for existance other than looks, becuase although all of us have simularly varying definitions of rice on our site, my personal one is, if it was done to only LOOK good, its rice.

You got a nice civic there, i love the color. wouldnt that painted valve cover piece be considered rice it was done for looks right or does the paint on the cover not look foking hott....lol

welcome to the boards.

by the way, why is the engine bay is black?
________
TEEN VID

caustic neon · Post by **caustic neon** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:03 pm

What radiator is that.

napalm588 · Post by **napalm588** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:06 pm

Origional paint was all red, and I dont know about you but I wasnt about to rock a christmas tree car

Even though I would have figured it would have worked out fine, He went for a high temp paint instead of the stuff he put on the body.

2GN.ORG

Well you all posted on Anti-rice...

Re: Well you all posted on Anti-rice...

Re: Well you all posted on Anti-rice...