Most wont like but whatever!!!!!!

Fuzzyneon · Post by **Fuzzyneon** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:44 pm

LowNSlow wrote:
Fuzzyneon wrote:
LowNSlow wrote: eh I wouldnt go that far
I wouldnt either it looks "different" not anywhere near as good since it was well made to flow with a 2gn and i kinda forced it lol
dont get me wrong i dont think it looks bad

but it flows a lot better with a 2gn

trust me lol i took no offence it was made for a 2gn and looks damn good on one i just made it work lol i got the fog bumper cause more cutouts with fogs there thinking it would break it up a bit better

theColonel · Post by **theColonel** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:52 pm

Fuzzyneon wrote: I might add a huge wing and a 20 inch fart cannon to just to make people angrier

I like the lip on your car, but I don't plan to add it to my 1GN. I also like the BIG WING on my 2GN. However, I can't stand fart cannons on anything

Fuzzyneon · Post by **Fuzzyneon** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:54 pm

laneholt wrote:
Fuzzyneon wrote: I might add a huge wing and a 20 inch fart cannon to just to make people angrier
I like the lip on your car, but I don't plan to add it to my 1GN. I also like the BIG WING on my 2GN. However, I can't stand fart cannons on anything

oh man my bad i really didnt even say that cause of your wing lol i was just naming random shit that makes people mad when they see it on cars my bad dude honestly i didnt shit

i actually like both your cars 1gn especially didnt mean anything personal

theColonel · Post by **theColonel** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:05 pm

Fuzzyneon wrote: oh man my bad i really didnt even say that cause of your wing lol i was just naming random shit that makes people mad when they see it on cars my bad dude honestly i didnt shit

i actually like both your cars 1gn especially didn't mean anything personal

I didn't take it personally .... my big wing doesn't suit everybody .... the 1GN car is very different than 2GN's

someday I want a 2.4 in my 99 R/T

LILBLUNEON · Post by **LILBLUNEON** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:08 pm

looks goood!

i wanna see better pics tho...

j-king · Post by **j-king** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:34 pm

looks good man

Fuzzyneon · Post by **Fuzzyneon** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:35 pm

laneholt wrote:
Fuzzyneon wrote: oh man my bad i really didnt even say that cause of your wing lol i was just naming random shit that makes people mad when they see it on cars my bad dude honestly i didnt shit

i actually like both your cars 1gn especially didn't mean anything personal
I didn't take it personally .... my big wing doesn't suit everybody .... the 1GN car is very different than 2GN's

someday I want a 2.4 in my 99 R/T

2.4 is worth it shoulda been stock in the r/t !

theColonel · Post by **theColonel** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:48 pm

Fuzzyneon wrote: 2.4 is worth it shoulda been stock in the r/t !

The 98 - 99 Dodge Neon R/T came with the 2.0 DOHC engine. I originally thought WTF, 2.0 DOHC Neon engine is 150 hp, just like the 2.4 DOHC Stratus engine.
The 2.4 (n/a) has more low end torque, and readily accepts turbo parts from the PT Cruiser and SRT-4. The 2.0 engine just doesn't have as much potential.

Sorry, this may be "more than you wanted to hear".

chipdogg · Post by **chipdogg** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:08 pm

2.4's are definitely awesome, I've done at least 10 2.4 swaps. Way more torque, and they respond so much better to mods. Building one right now for the 98 ACR coupe in the driveway, my purple car has one with Crane 18's, my black coupe has one that I've pillaged for parts, and the NYG I got rid of had a rebuilt 2.4 I stuck in it. No need to downshift, especially with a 3.94 in it.

I prefer the stock look myself, even a bit on the beat up side.

Fuzzyneon · Post by **Fuzzyneon** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:28 pm

laneholt wrote:
Fuzzyneon wrote: 2.4 is worth it shoulda been stock in the r/t !
The 98 - 99 Dodge Neon R/T came with the 2.0 DOHC engine. I originally thought WTF, 2.0 DOHC Neon engine is 150 hp, just like the 2.4 DOHC Stratus engine.
The 2.4 (n/a) has more low end torque, and readily accepts turbo parts from the PT Cruiser and SRT-4. The 2.0 engine just doesn't have as much potential.

Sorry, this may be "more than you wanted to hear".

for the shear torque feel its worth it much more "sporty" feeling for a r/t trim

Ill try to get better pics soon guys i have to pull up the one side a bit its kinda bugging me

chipdogg · Post by **chipdogg** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:43 pm

Fuzzyneon wrote:
laneholt wrote:
Fuzzyneon wrote: 2.4 is worth it shoulda been stock in the r/t !
The 98 - 99 Dodge Neon R/T came with the 2.0 DOHC engine. I originally thought WTF, 2.0 DOHC Neon engine is 150 hp, just like the 2.4 DOHC Stratus engine.
The 2.4 (n/a) has more low end torque, and readily accepts turbo parts from the PT Cruiser and SRT-4. The 2.0 engine just doesn't have as much potential.

Sorry, this may be "more than you wanted to hear".
for the shear torque feel its worth it much more "sporty" feeling for a r/t trim

Ill try to get better pics soon guys i have to pull up the one side a bit its kinda bugging me

Well it depends on what you do with the car. I drag race them regularly and don't really care to have a comfortable car when I can have a rough vibrating ride that gets up and goes.