It is badged as the GT.Hudson_Neon wrote:just heard that the R/T is no longer called that. i heard that it's not the GT and has a slightly smaller price tag
http://www.allpar.com/news/index.php/20 ... troit-show
It is badged as the GT.Hudson_Neon wrote:just heard that the R/T is no longer called that. i heard that it's not the GT and has a slightly smaller price tag
titansxt wrote:
http://www.allpar.com/news/index.php/20 ... ary-sketchMyNeonSaysHi wrote:Uhhh info/link?
Look one post up or one page back.ZeroChad wrote:Since no one else posted the link
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/dodge-da ... o-5548049/
ram50rocket wrote: I must had been mistaken in thinking that NEONS.ORG was just for neons.
Midnight_Rider wrote:titansxt wrote:http://www.allpar.com/news/index.php/20 ... ary-sketchMyNeonSaysHi wrote:Uhhh info/link?
"back in the day", I owned a brand new 1965 Dodge Dart - there were 4 engines available: a) 170 cid 6 cylinder ... 101 hp b) 225 cid 6 cylinder ... 145 hpHudson_Neon wrote:I think many people who complain about the offerings of the dart engines need to do a little research about the original dart. The original dart weighed in at an average of 3400 lbs and came standard with a 101 hp slant-6 with a 3 speed manual behind it. with that being considered, this dart is kinda nice weighing about 3200 with a 160 hp I4 turbo...
My 1999 Dodge Neon R/T with a 2.0 DOHC engine had 150 hp, weighed 2,400 lbs, had rack & pinion steering, 4 wheel disc brakes with ABS -Hudson_Neon wrote:either way... more weight, less power, crappier handling than a modern dart...
i realize that you dislike the dart and enjoy to mock me... that being said, i never compared the new 4 door dart, with all it's features and tons of electronics, to your '99 neon that, considering it was an r/t, was likely a 2 door and was probably loaded with nothing for features due to the fact of being a neon. i'm comparing apples to apples. the 1960 dart was, more often than not, an under powered 4 door. thus this new dart isn't that surprising to me. it is what it is man. your complaining can only do so much, none of which is fixing the power/weight ratio. maybe you should just go work for chrysler and fix this all for us!theColonel wrote:My 1999 Dodge Neon R/T with a 2.0 Dohc engine had 150 hp, weighed 2,400 lbs, had rack & pinion steering, 4 wheel disc brakes with ABS -Hudson_Neon wrote:either way... more weight, less power, crappier handling than a modern dart...
The 2013 Dodge Dart with a 2.0 DOHC engine only has 160 hp & weighs 3,200 lbs - this is progress
The dart also has a 1.4 liter engine to make 160HP vs your 2.0, and gets 41MPG highway as reported by the EPA's new rating system, and a 6 speed electronically shifted manual transmission.theColonel wrote:My 1999 Dodge Neon R/T with a 2.0 DOHC engine had 150 hp, weighed 2,400 lbs, had rack & pinion steering, 4 wheel disc brakes with ABS -Hudson_Neon wrote:either way... more weight, less power, crappier handling than a modern dart...
The 2013 Dodge Dart with a 2.0 DOHC engine has 160 hp & weighs 3,200 lbs - this is real progress