accelertion lag

Have a question that your not sure what category it fits into or isn't really a specific question about a specific part? Ask it here...
Post Reply
neon angel
2GN Member
Posts: 667
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 3:52 am
Location: belleville,ill

accelertion lag

Post by neon angel » Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:02 am

ok i have an o5 sxt atx i have cai custom exhaust i devently have more power but my accel sucks what can i do to get a better accel?
2005 neon sxt 2.0L 16v
custom cai,unorthadox udp,magnacore 8.5mmrace wires,ngk pllugs,R/T HEADER and ACTIVE R/T MANIFOLD,srt cat back,ps2 mopar lip kit and unforunately atx

User avatar
MyNeonSaysHi
2GN Veteran
Posts: 11898
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Kansas

Post by MyNeonSaysHi » Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:15 am

You have an ATX, theres your problem. Theres like a 20% drivtrain loss through the automatic transmission. You are probably pushing 80hp at the wheels. A cold air intake won't really do much. You will gain a couple horses, but its mostly for sound. Plus you are plagued with the NGC. If you want more power, swap out the tranny and engine and put one of those ever so popular SRT-4 turbo's in your car. Then you will go fast. I am not trying to diss on ATX's, cause I have one and I know how flippin slow they are.

No swap? Not much money?

If you want to free up a couple more horses get a 60 mm throttle body a nice exhaust and one of those underdrive pullies. That should help out a tad bit. But some source of forced induction is your best bet for power.
I know others can add to this.

08 Acura TL-S
05 Neon SRT-4

OB
Former Moderator
Posts: 9686
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA

Post by OB » Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:55 am

60mm tb is good for low end kick from what i hear (well low end throttle response, that is.) do those work with atx tho?

otherwise, boost or nitrous.
-Derek

|Donate to 2gn|Feedback || OB's | GozziFab | All Business |


JRM
2GN Member
Posts: 3512
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:35 pm
Location: MO

Post by JRM » Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:47 am

yep tb works just fine with automatic. most parts arent specific for mtx or atx
Image
06 Ford F150 Stock truck 23x,xxx miles and running strong
05 Chevy Equinox Wifey's

Official I sold my Neon Member #482

OB
Former Moderator
Posts: 9686
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA

Post by OB » Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:49 am

jrm868s wrote:yep tb works just fine with automatic. most parts arent specific for mtx or atx
I know the older tb's from the auto 1gns are bigger than those of the same year mtx, just making sure thats not the case anymore.
-Derek

|Donate to 2gn|Feedback || OB's | GozziFab | All Business |


neonpla
2GN Member
Posts: 2571
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 2:27 am
Location: Killeen, TX

Post by neonpla » Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:22 pm

get rid of the atx, thats what you do.
2008 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited
2005 Dodge Neon SRT4

dinetuner
2GN Member
Posts: 2512
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Suprise,AZ

Post by dinetuner » Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:51 pm

orangeblastsxt wrote:
jrm868s wrote:yep tb works just fine with automatic. most parts arent specific for mtx or atx
I know the older tb's from the auto 1gns are bigger than those of the same year mtx, just making sure thats not the case anymore.
2gn TB are the same size the larger 52mm but it sucks they are now plastic so they cant be OB
bad01neon wrote: obviously the 10 year old consented, so its ok lol :lol:

atom
2GN Member
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by atom » Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:18 pm

raul-01 wrote:Theres like a 20% drivtrain loss through the
Where did u get this? I've never heard of such a thing the only thing i thought was that the gears changed slower.
Image

lilolneon
2GN Member
Posts: 2827
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:38 am
Location: Ellijay, GA

Post by lilolneon » Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:26 pm

nah, autos take some of the engines power to change the gears automatically. thats why a manual tranny gets better mileage cause you do the gear shiftin yourself and put the power to the wheels where it belongs.

And yes, the tranny is electroniclly controlled for shifting, but it still takes power from the engine to actually change the gears.

As far as a tranny swap goes its possible to be done. Theres several posts flying around here on whats needed to do it.
Image
2003 Atlantic Blue SE (R.I.P. 03-06)
2003 Black SXT (R.I.P. 06-14)
2007 Silver Civic LX Coupe

User avatar
grambo
Former Moderator
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Tracy, NOR-CAL

Post by grambo » Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:56 pm

Neons have NO low end. It sucks ballz. Nothing starts happening until after 3250 RPM's on my car......and all my TB did was increase throttle response and the amount of gas "dumped" into the motor...my car feels SO slow lately..... :roll:
If you want the feel of a V8 buy the new GTI turbo...
01' Neon ACR - SOLD - Its Alive!Thx Sean!
06' Subaru WRX STI - OTS Stage II
07 - Dodge Charger SRT-8 Super Bee #0267
01' Dodge Ram 5.7 - The Mall Crawler

User avatar
kc2005ptgt
Former Moderator
Posts: 6587
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 7:39 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO
Contact:

Post by kc2005ptgt » Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:05 pm

Have you changed plugs lately, Grambo?

It always helps my car. I wonder if it has anything to do with larger plugs??? I also wonder if I should go back to stock coil pack.
SOLD 5/13- 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT Convertible | 2.4L Turbo HO | Bright Silver Metallic
SOLD 7/09- 2002 Dodge Neon ACR | Flame Red
The Offical: Sold My Neon Even Though I Swore I Never Would Club | Member #777

Image

User avatar
grambo
Former Moderator
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Tracy, NOR-CAL

Post by grambo » Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:54 pm

^The last set of plugs I put in were NGK Iridiums...I better damn well not need plugs.... :?
01' Neon ACR - SOLD - Its Alive!Thx Sean!
06' Subaru WRX STI - OTS Stage II
07 - Dodge Charger SRT-8 Super Bee #0267
01' Dodge Ram 5.7 - The Mall Crawler

esteinmaier
Supporting Vendor
Posts: 3324
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:40 pm

Post by esteinmaier » Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:11 pm

atom wrote:
raul-01 wrote:Theres like a 20% drivtrain loss through the
Where did u get this? I've never heard of such a thing the only thing i thought was that the gears changed slower.
You know how you stop the car and it's in gear but the motor is still running? Well, there's all your lost power. Auto transmissions are like a manual that has a slipping clutch. Otherwise it would die when you stop, and most people would rather do their makeup or talk on their phone than actually drive. More evidence of the McDonalds age.

User avatar
Panhead
2GN Member
Posts: 2624
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:47 pm
Contact:

Post by Panhead » Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:30 pm

neon angel wrote:ok i have an o5 sxt atx i have cai custom exhaust i devently have more power but my accel sucks what can i do to get a better accel?
just do simple bolt-ons, get the magnum intake, 60mm tbi, UDP. it'll give you a little more pep.


i have had heard rumors that the autos that are controlled electronically do 15 lows. ask tamadrumer88, he knows.
Juice
Image


"There is no "G" in Cummins"

Keep it Mopar, buy Mopar Parts

Mat
2GN Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:01 pm

Post by Mat » Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:28 am

I wrote this list out for another person on the site:

Fill your motor mounts with 3M windshield caulk
Put Falken Azenis tires on the front
Put on a race UDP and lose your A/C and P/S.
Used K&N air filter in the stock airbox
Gut the interior, lose the back seat, and take all the crap out of your trunk.

Good for faster accelleration for under $250.

You also might want to look into a manual valve body, trans cooler, and a stall converter.
Fix it 'till it's broken. Then upgrade.

User avatar
MyNeonSaysHi
2GN Veteran
Posts: 11898
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Kansas

Post by MyNeonSaysHi » Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:42 pm

I Don't think they have a stall converter or manual valve body for 4 speeds. Why fill up the motormounts with caulk? :lol:

08 Acura TL-S
05 Neon SRT-4

Mopar00Neon
2GN Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: EL Laaaay, CA.

Post by Mopar00Neon » Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:14 pm

raul-01 wrote: Why fill up the motormounts with caulk? :lol:
Its a ghetto way of getting soild motor mounts. But it wont really do anything for acceleration.
He is unworthy of the name of man who is ignorant of the fact that the diagonal of a square is incommensurable with its side.

-brian

2007 F-150
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander
2004 F-350
2000 Dodge Neon
1957 Chevy truck
1989 Chevy 1500

Image

User avatar
half_twisted
2GN Member
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:31 pm
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Contact:

Post by half_twisted » Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:01 pm

Mopar00Neon wrote:
raul-01 wrote: Why fill up the motormounts with caulk? :lol:
Its a ghetto way of getting soild motor mounts. But it wont really do anything for acceleration.

if I may educate or specify what 3m item you need, Its 3m item #8609 URETHANE WINDOW ADHESIVE. when preparing to fill you have to wash and dry, than mask one side with tape then fill on the other. let it dry out for about 3-4 days to fully cure..
Image

Mopar00Neon
2GN Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: EL Laaaay, CA.

Post by Mopar00Neon » Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:23 pm

half_twisted wrote:
Mopar00Neon wrote:
raul-01 wrote: Why fill up the motormounts with caulk? :lol:
Its a ghetto way of getting soild motor mounts. But it wont really do anything for acceleration.

if I may educate or specify what 3m item you need, Its 3m item #8609 URETHANE WINDOW ADHESIVE. when preparing to fill you have to wash and dry, than mask one side with tape then fill on the other. let it dry out for about 3-4 days to fully cure..
Oh, I know. We've done it ourselves. But Deyeme mounts are MUCH better. Theyre firmer and last longer.
He is unworthy of the name of man who is ignorant of the fact that the diagonal of a square is incommensurable with its side.

-brian

2007 F-150
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander
2004 F-350
2000 Dodge Neon
1957 Chevy truck
1989 Chevy 1500

Image

User avatar
dawm
2GN Member
Posts: 1867
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:50 pm
Location: Wayne, MI
Contact:

Post by dawm » Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:16 pm

ATX = horrible launch.. but when your actually moving its not that bad.. still no where near MTX power
12 Subaru WRX hatch - #notadowngrade
04 Neon - #base2SRT #24NAprojectgoneSRT
03 Subaru Forester 2.5XS - #gfscar #butiown
06 Subaru WRX STi - #traded4hatchback12WRX #gone
98 Neon R/T 2.4L Turbo Coupe - #7yearproject #SRTified #megasquirt
http://www.st1ck3rs.com
http://www.detroitneonowners.org

User avatar
MyNeonSaysHi
2GN Veteran
Posts: 11898
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Kansas

Post by MyNeonSaysHi » Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:45 am

dawm wrote:ATX = horrible launch.. but when your actually moving its not that bad.. still NO WHERE near MTX power
Fixed it for yah. :D

08 Acura TL-S
05 Neon SRT-4

User avatar
SiberianNeon0
2GN Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:28 am
Location: Syracuse/Buffalo

I dont know what you guys are talkin' about

Post by SiberianNeon0 » Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:52 pm

I have an ATX 2002 SXT and I can tell you I have no idea what your talking about with them being slow. I thought neons have pretty good low end torque 132 isn't bad for a 2.0L engine stock. Afterall, the pickup these little cars had was their big selling point if I have done enough research.

It is true that they have a slow start, I do not argue. But no way is a manual more "powerful" than an auto. It's the same engine, just different computer. All you get from a manual is the ability to control where you're shifting. But no human can shift a car perfectly. Change your autos shift-points if you really think it sucks, but most drag-cars are 3spd autos anyways.

User avatar
03neonRT
2GN Member
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:43 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

Post by 03neonRT » Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:01 am

Its called "drivetrain loss" my friend, and autos have much more drivetrain loss than manuals...its especially more noticeable in low HP/TQ cars.

So while your ATX has the same crank HP and TQ, your putting down 5%-10% less power at the wheels.
- 2003 Dodge Neon R/T -

Mat
2GN Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:01 pm

Post by Mat » Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:59 pm

03neonRT wrote:Its called "drivetrain loss" my friend, and autos have much more drivetrain loss than manuals...its especially more noticeable in low HP/TQ cars.

So while your ATX has the same crank HP and TQ, your putting down 5%-10% less power at the wheels.
Bingo.
Fix it 'till it's broken. Then upgrade.

User avatar
BlackRoseRacing
2009 Platinum Contributor
Posts: 12729
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 8:58 am

Post by BlackRoseRacing » Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:17 pm

So while your ATX has the same crank HP and TQ, your putting down 5%-10% less power at the wheels.
:roll: 5-10% loss is in the MTX's, try 20-30% loss with an ATX!!! :wink:

User avatar
03neonRT
2GN Member
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:43 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

Post by 03neonRT » Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:22 pm

BlackRoseRacing wrote:
So while your ATX has the same crank HP and TQ, your putting down 5%-10% less power at the wheels.
:roll: 5-10% loss is in the MTX's, try 20-30% loss with an ATX!!! :wink:
I was saying the ATX has 5%-10% more loss than the MTX...but yeah, even at that its still a low guestimation for drivetrain loss...oh well, thats why i dont own an ATX!
- 2003 Dodge Neon R/T -

Post Reply

Return to “General 2nd Gen Discussion”