New to the Forum let me know what you think. *updated pic's*

spencersummerfield · Post by **spencersummerfield** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:32 am

Ya Ontario Born and raised.

And it is not an R/T it is a 2000, but i have the R/T bumper and side skirts, and it is FASTER than the RT. so i thouhgt it deserved the "high output" fuel rail cover. and TOkico shocks are BLUE, TEIN springs are green.

LCPLPunk · Post by **LCPLPunk** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:43 am

how is it faster than an R/T?

ChrisRT · Post by **ChrisRT** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:01 am

TNK wrote:
LCPLPunk wrote:oooh, u have an R/T bumper AND side skirts, nice.
that's usually what comes on an R/T....

But its not an R/T.

spencersummerfield · Post by **spencersummerfield** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:10 am

faster?. just cause it is......
8lbs rims.

-AEM Coldair Intake
-BRULLEN 2.5" Cat-Back Exhaust
-AF/X Underdrive Pulley
-NOLOGY Hotwires Sparkplug Wires
-NOLOGY Powercore Coil Amplifers
-AROSPEED Hyperground System
-MC FAB Short Shifter
-BOOGER Shifter Bushings
-ENERGY Motor Mount Inserts

ChrisRT · Post by **ChrisRT** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:20 am

Never mind the fact that a stock R/T has a factory header, and a better intake manifold, a different camshaft, different and better cylinder head, etc, none of that plays into performance.....

P.S. My R/T has the same bolt-ons, (intake, UDP, and a thermal axle-back.) the same engine mounts, a Mopar STS, and Mopar Performnace wires, and I'll put money up that its quicker than your car.

LCPLPunk · Post by **LCPLPunk** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:31 am

i've got MM inserts and booger bushings and i bet my R/T is faster..

Paralyzer · Post by **Paralyzer** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:33 am

god can't wait to get my kit on.....which looks like I will in I hope 2 weeks

MyNeonSaysHi · Post by **MyNeonSaysHi** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 am

ChrisRT wrote:Never mind the fact that a stock R/T has a factory header, and a better intake manifold, a different camshaft, different and better cylinder head, etc, none of that plays into performance.....

P.S. My R/T has the same bolt-ons, (intake, UDP, and a thermal axle-back.) the same engine mounts, a Mopar STS, and Mopar Performnace wires, and I'll put money up that its quicker than your car.

I got an ATX that goes 0-60 in 10 seconds flat!

kplaya186 · Post by **kplaya186** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:37 am

TNK wrote:
LCPLPunk wrote:oooh, u have an R/T bumper AND side skirts, nice.
that's usually what comes on an R/T....

I thought R/T's came with an aluminum Intake Mani??

neonpla · Post by **neonpla** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:42 am

joelrgr wrote:Teins are blue?...

to tokico are blue, he must have tien springs.

ChrisRT · Post by **ChrisRT** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:10 am

-CgPeon- wrote:
ChrisRT wrote:Never mind the fact that a stock R/T has a factory header, and a better intake manifold, a different camshaft, different and better cylinder head, etc, none of that plays into performance.....

P.S. My R/T has the same bolt-ons, (intake, UDP, and a thermal axle-back.) the same engine mounts, a Mopar STS, and Mopar Performnace wires, and I'll put money up that its quicker than your car.
I got an ATX that goes 0-60 in 10 seconds flat!

My Dakota is almost to the 1000ft mark by then! lol

quicksilvr · Post by **quicksilvr** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 3:14 pm

spencersummerfield wrote:faster?. just cause it is......
8lbs rims.

-AEM Coldair Intake
-BRULLEN 2.5" Cat-Back Exhaust
-AF/X Underdrive Pulley
-NOLOGY Hotwires Sparkplug Wires
-NOLOGY Powercore Coil Amplifers
-AROSPEED Hyperground System
-MC FAB Short Shifter
-BOOGER Shifter Bushings
-ENERGY Motor Mount Inserts

Dude, your car looks nice, and it's very clean, but I wouldn't be claiming anything like that. I've got WAY more performance mods than you, and when I raced kc2002acr at the drag strip, he beat me every time. I would beat a stock R/T in a rolling street race, but not by a whole lot.

That said, keep up the good work with the car!

NeoNiaiN · Post by **NeoNiaiN** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:32 pm

Nice car.

Post by **Diablo0** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:17 pm

NeoNiaiN wrote:Nice car.

Holy crap! Where the hell have you been? lol

dblsg · Post by **dblsg** » Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:08 am

kplaya186 wrote:
TNK wrote:
LCPLPunk wrote:oooh, u have an R/T bumper AND side skirts, nice.
that's usually what comes on an R/T.... but don't listen to me, i'm a
I thought R/T's came with an aluminum Intake Mani??

hehe, fixed it

spencersummerfield · Post by **spencersummerfield** » Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:33 am

Credit goes back to you iain, such a sweet car you know it!.

NeoNiaiN

^^^^^^^

the man, and original owner who invented the 2000 i own today:)

thanks again man!

MoxHair · Post by **MoxHair** » Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:39 am

quicksilvr wrote:
spencersummerfield wrote:faster?. just cause it is......
8lbs rims.

-AEM Coldair Intake
-BRULLEN 2.5" Cat-Back Exhaust
-AF/X Underdrive Pulley
-NOLOGY Hotwires Sparkplug Wires
-NOLOGY Powercore Coil Amplifers
-AROSPEED Hyperground System
-MC FAB Short Shifter
-BOOGER Shifter Bushings
-ENERGY Motor Mount Inserts

Dude, your car looks nice, and it's very clean, but I wouldn't be claiming anything like that. I've got WAY more performance mods than you, and when I raced kc2002acr at the drag strip, he beat me every time. I would beat a stock R/T in a rolling street race, but not by a whole lot.

That said, keep up the good work with the car!

Except I had an R/T .. 0-60 in the low low 7s.

TNK · Post by **TNK** » Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:38 pm

Diablo0 wrote:
NeoNiaiN wrote:Nice car.
Holy crap! Where the hell have you been? lol

kc2005ptgt · Post by **kc2005ptgt** » Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:43 pm

nice car, I like it... except the stickers outside, not a big fan. I love those wheels, they look great! Just an fyi, I do not think your car will beat an R/T - just a theory I have, but unless you have a better intake mani, better head, bigger cam, and better flowing exhaust mani you will not be coming close to an r/t...

unless of course those stickers under the hood add some hp...

I jest!

spencersummerfield · Post by **spencersummerfield** » Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:05 am

my correction then all, *i little birdie told me*..
one day it will be FASTER!...

SPen

NeoNiaiN · Post by **NeoNiaiN** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:16 am

kc2002acr wrote:nice car, I like it... except the stickers outside, not a big fan. I love those wheels, they look great! Just an fyi, I do not think your car will beat an R/T - just a theory I have, but unless you have a better intake mani, better head, bigger cam, and better flowing exhaust mani you will not be coming close to an r/t...

unless of course those stickers under the hood add some hp... I jest!

you sig shows you run a15.8...

spencers car...ie: my old car runs consistant 15.7's with a full tank of regular...the fastest was a 15.5 -once but a consider that a fluke run.... my LE AVERAGES 15.7 ...so dont talk shit unless you know who you are talking to.....

"The thrill of 150 horses under my foot.
15.815 @ 87.48 MPH"

SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE

TNK · Post by **TNK** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:25 am

owned.

702Neon · Post by **702Neon** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:52 am

the guy just showin' off his ride and thinks he got what it takes to beat an r/t. w/ those mods he'll beat a stock R/T (if he can drive). but if he races R/T w/ the same mods as he has....forget about it he doesn't have a chance. i raced a friends of mine stock r/t and i have a 2005 sohc w/ Injen CAI and SRT-4 rear section and i beat him by a 2 lengths. but still......a very nice ride man. looks nice.
________
New mexico medical marijuana dispensary

flhmfd · Post by **flhmfd** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:34 pm

needs to be dropped a little more...i put on some beefier tires. or both

MoxHair · Post by **MoxHair** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:36 pm

and a non-functional boost guage...

just messing with you bro

702Neon · Post by **702Neon** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:48 pm

moxhairr/t wrote:and a non-functional boost guage...

haha. just drop it and it'll look sick.
btw. you have tein springs....why is it sitting so high? because of Tokico shocks?

you know what. just get a front camber kit and change the front wheel degree. it'll lower the front just a little bit and it'll give your ride a mean look.
________
ARIZONA MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY

spencersummerfield · Post by **spencersummerfield** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:19 pm

haha, it is just a VAC gauge, not a boost/vac it just shows me if there are any intake leaks and moves with my throttle.....

anyways ya it isnt actually sitting that high it is from the pics there is only about an INCH mabye between the fender and tires..
and the shocks have a great rebound and yes they do keep the springs looking a bit taller...

adn to all you haters.. I posted it would beat a RT... and yes i was talking about a STOCK rt. which is pretty good considering a stock 2000 comes with 130 at the Crank NOT even at the wheels..

"if he can drive" wow.. if you only knew.

702Neon · Post by **702Neon** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:37 pm

spencersummerfield wrote:
"if he can drive" wow.. if you only knew.

what i was trying to say was that you have to know your shift times.
if you go too far(or not enought) with your RPMs. ur fu*ked. i don't go over 5000 RPMs (go figure no secondaries, well i go almost to 6000 but that's only on 1st)
________
Vaporizer Volcano

NeoNiaiN · Post by **NeoNiaiN** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 2:54 pm

702Neon wrote:the guy just showin' off his ride and thinks he got what it takes to beat an r/t. w/ those mods he'll beat a stock R/T (if he can drive). but if he races R/T w/ the same mods as he has....forget about it he doesn't have a chance.

Riiight....

i have three friends with R/T's with the same mods plus Lt headders (af/x) and they run between 15.6 and 15.9 at the same track, the same day i run 15.5-15.7....so, YES he has a chance.....LOL

702Neon · Post by **702Neon** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:04 pm

^^^^^ let's not make it into another thread but but how can SOHC engine be more powerfull then Dohc engine? i'm just saying' there's no way. ur mods are just better.
________
Expert insurance

2GN.ORG

New to the Forum let me know what you think. updated pic's

faster cause i want it to be... and becasue it is.

Re: faster cause i want it to be... and becasue it is.

NeoNiaiN

Re: faster cause i want it to be... and becasue it is.