
http://www.classglassperformance.com/02%20NEON.html

Diablo0 wrote:I'd be a little afraid to drive the car too... someone t-bones the car... i don't they'll hold up quite as well without some steel reinforcements

TheRandom1 wrote:My true opinion here is that the only time rubber should be stretched is when it's going over a penis.
DOT would be right in making you do so. Although Carbon Fiber is advertised to being strong and lightweight, it's strength really only lies in one direction. The resin that is cured to bond the fibers together give the CF it's true strength. However, during destructive testing I believe Carbon Fiber to be as durable as Fiberglass in high-velocity localized stress impacts, i.e. a hammer hitting it at say 40mph, in that it is not very strong compared to High-Carbon steel. Once the steel supports are removed from a door, the only thing protecting you is the door skin, and even then a steel door skin would only provide barely any more protection than a Fiberglass or Carbon Fiber one. You can also try to get away with placing steel bars in the door for crash protection but even then the issue that comes with Carbon Fiber cracking and splintering when hit would be an issue. It isn't as bad as Fiberglass, but not as good as steel, since steel has a much higher yield point for localized impacts. If you really wanted to go this route for a daily driver (show cars not included) You would have to weld or bolt in an approved roll cage for crash protection. I can pretty much guess that any weight loss would be offset by the fact you need to add in additional crash support, plus it could just be ONLY the door skin and not the steel frame of the door, and maybe only save you a few pounds?(sic)Arkangel wrote:They aren't I had a set of CF door for my Si and the DOT made me take them off. I am going to get rear cf doors (for my 1gn) but you have to cage the car (with a bar blocking the passanger from flying the door) for it to be deemed safe.