the history of our neon's

turbohead · Post by **turbohead** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:51 pm

everybody should read this if you drive a dodge neon
...........read.................read...............read...............read
The first generation Neon was introduced in January 1994 and manufactured for model years 1995 to 1999. It was available as a 4-door sedan or 2-door coupe. It was powered by either a 132hp SAE (98kW) 2.0L SOHC or a 150hp SAE (112kW) 2.0L DOHC 4-cylinder engine. The Neon was available with a 3-speed automatic transmission or a 5-speed manual transmission and was sold as a Dodge and Plymouth in the United States, as a Dodge and Chrysler (also under the name 2.0SX) in Canada, and as the Chrysler Neon outside of North America.

Often neglected in discussions of the Neon is the relative horsepower compared to other cars of the day - the Civic DX at 102, the Civic EX at 125, the Sentra and Sunbird at 110, the Escort at 88, the Corolla at 115, etc. The Neon's torque was also higher than competitors. In addition, the Neon made a sizable profit - the only recent American car in its class to do so.

First-generation Neons are highly competitive in Solo I and Solo II autocross racing. The no-frills SOHC or DOHC-equipped ACR (ACR = American Club Racer, sedans and coupes, respectively) variants are well-known as affordable amateur racing cars. Both the ACR and the more feature-laden R/T (introduced in the 1998 model year) models, each available as either a sedan or a coupe, featured four-wheel disc brakes; performance-oriented suspensions with shorter, stiffer springs, beefier swaybars, and fast-ratio steering; and a 5-speed transmission with a numerically higher 5th gear and final drive ratio for quicker acceleration. The computer-controlled top speed limiter was removed entirely on 1995 ACR models and raised from the standard 190 km/h (118 mph) to 210 km/h (130 mph) on both the ACR and R/T models for subsequent years. Even second generation Neons had a strong racing record.

Early Neons had from a number of reliability problems, the most famous being head gasket failures. By November 1998, the head gasket had been replaced with a new MLS (Multi Layer Steel) design which proved to be much more reliable and was standard in most 1999 models and was also retrofitted to earlier models. There were also rumors that 1 of the 8 head bolt holes had been drilled slightly too shallow on many of the blocks, so when the bolt was tightened it simply "bottomed out" instead of holding the head to the block with the correct amount of force. Many early Neons suffered from poor paint jobs, where the paint became brittle and peeled off in sheets, partly because of teething problems with a new environmentally-friendly "dry painting" process. Either way, by the end of the first generation, most of the major problems had been sorted out and the Neon proved to be a reliable car. Unfortunately, the Neon's early reputation for poor reliability persists even today, possibly because Chrysler failed to adequately publicize its improvements or proactively reach out to customers who had experienced failures.

Neons also suffered from some interesting design choices, including the impossibility of gaining power windows in the rear doors, and a climate control system which had drivers move the fan knob in one direction for air conditioning and the other for vent. The latter caused less conscious drivers to drive consistently with the air conditioner on, which greatly hurt power and gas mileage, since the unit was quite powerful. Also, the car automatically turned on the air conditioning whenever the defroster was used, regardless of which side the fan control was set own. Owners often would disable the contact on the selector knob allowing them to use the defroster without air conditioning. The air conditioning evaporator proved to be prone to failure after warranties expired (a problem apparently addressed in later years) which is an expensive repair since it is relatively inaccessible.

Certain color Neons, such as red and black, had bumper covers molded in color rather than painted. These covers would not shine like paint, but they absorbed scuffs and scrapes with less notice. The mid-level Highline models were well known for their unique "bubble" hubcap design.

The Australian-market Chrysler Neon came in two models, the SE and the better equipped LX. Later, the LX model was replaced by the LE with the updated model in 1999. In the United States, the lineup started out as Base, Highline, and Sport, with different styles and options in each line, but the lineup titles changed frequently (other trim lines included Expresso, SE, ES, SXT, ACR, and R/T). In Europe, the car was also available with a 1.8L engine.

2000–2005
Sales of the second generation model started with model year 2000 and production ended with the 2005 model year. The second-generation Neon was only available as a 4-door sedan. In some regions, including the United States, the sole engine was the 2.0 L SOHC engine, with an optional Magnum configuration (including an active intake manifold) that produced 150 hp.

The second generation was much more refined than the first-generation car. It was advertised that the second generation Neon had over 1,000 refinements from the original generation. Frameless windows (which would pull away from the door in a strong crosswind) were replaced with a full-framed door. Numerous other NVH refinements led to a much quieter and enjoyable passenger car. The more refined interior and greater size did, however, come at the cost of increased weight. This, along with the discontinuance of the DOHC engine, caused the second generation car to be less competitive on a race track.

When DaimlerChrysler discontinued the Plymouth brand in 2001, the former Plymouth Neon and Dodge Neon were briefly sold under the Chrysler name in Canada until 2002. In Europe, Australia, and Asia, the car has always been sold as a Chrysler, as Dodge and Plymouth were not available there. Besides the 2.0L engine, it also used the same Tritec 1.6L unit found in the BMW MINI prior to 2007. The 1.6 L unit is a variation of the 2.0 L SOHC engine designed by Chrysler and built jointly by Chrysler and Rover.

Originally, the second generation Neon featured a five-speed manual transmission using the former ACR gear ratios to make up for the acceleration loss caused by greater weight. However, this hurt gas mileage and made the car noisier on the highway, and eventually the original gear ratios were restored along with the original gas mileage. A four-speed automatic made its way into the Neon in 2002, with moderately poorly set up gearing. This was improved a year later. The Neon never did get rear power windows, making do with manual rear windows and front power windows.

In an attempt to rid the car of its reputation, the Neon's name was changed to SX2.0 in Canada in 2003, though the Dodge Neon was eventually brought back. In Australia, the Chrysler Neon was discontinued in 2002, due to declining sales and expensive price compared to its competitors. In 2002, the front clip was changed to match the R/T and ACR front clip. The ACR and R/T models were discontinued for 2005.

2006
DaimlerChrysler discontinued the Neon line, with the final cars assembled on September 23, 2005 at the Belvidere Assembly plant in Belvidere, Illinois. The Neon will be replaced in the spring of 2006 with the 2007 Dodge Caliber, which is based on the shared Chrysler/Mitsubishi Motors GS platform.

Nutmeg · Post by **Nutmeg** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:26 pm

Did you just copy and paste this from Allpar or something? We can all use Google and read about Neon history. No offence, but most of us know this stuff.

By the way, it's NEONS. Not NEON'S. There is no possessive.

turbohead · Post by **turbohead** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:40 pm

dont be jealious

,and you didnt know most of it,i was just being nice and posting it on our org so you didnt have to look it up.
and this isnt the spelling B, people know what im saying.SORRY IF I THOUGHT ABOUT IT BEFORE YOU

NEON'S

Swordfish2Cowboy · Post by **Swordfish2Cowboy** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:41 pm

lol

I knew most of it.

Nutmeg · Post by **Nutmeg** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:04 am

turbohead wrote:dont be jealious ,and you didnt know most of it,i was just being nice and posting it on our org so you didnt have to look it up.
and this isnt the spelling B, people know what im saying.SORRY IF I THOUGHT ABOUT IT BEFORE YOU

NEON'S

Yeah, I'm jealous. And it's not spelling; it's grammar. And I'm pretty sure I knew most of it. Why look it up?

turbohead · Post by **turbohead** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:21 am

i know you are,its ok bro,people get like that sometime's

why look it up,maybe because some people are interested in knowing.

question: why be a smart ass?

answer: maybe because people wanna make other people think they know everything,when they dont know shit!

Swordfish2Cowboy · Post by **Swordfish2Cowboy** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:35 am

ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok no fighting. We only fight with Civics.

Nutmeg · Post by **Nutmeg** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:40 am

turbohead wrote:i know you are,its ok bro,people get like that sometime's

why look it up,maybe because some people are interested in knowing.

question: why be a smart ass?

answer: maybe because people wanna make other people think they know everything,when they dont know shit!

I'm glad I made your sig!

titansxt · Post by **titansxt** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:16 am

Swordfish2Cowboy wrote:ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok no fighting. We only fight with Civics.

I punched a tv once...

Midnight_Rider · Post by **Midnight_Rider** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:06 am

turbohead wrote:...a climate control system which had drivers move the fan knob in one direction for air conditioning and the other for vent. The latter caused less conscious drivers to drive consistently with the air conditioner on, which greatly hurt power and gas mileage, since the unit was quite powerful.

Yeah, drivers who obviously didn't read the owner's manual about climate control operations.

turbohead wrote: Also, the car automatically turned on the air conditioning whenever the defroster was used, regardless of which side the fan control was set own...

All cars do this, not just Neons.

Post by **racer12306** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:58 am

Are you guys seriously going to argue about this?

Nutmeg · Post by **Nutmeg** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:06 am

Yeah.

Post by **racer12306** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:47 am

How about you don't? Sounds good to me.

Swordfish2Cowboy · Post by **Swordfish2Cowboy** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:13 am

I think we should all take advice from titansxt and punch televisions instead.

Nutmeg · Post by **Nutmeg** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:25 pm

racer12306 wrote:How about you don't? Sounds good to me.

If you ever got to know me, you would find out that nearly 85% of the things I say are sarcastic. No worries.

turbohead · Post by **turbohead** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:55 pm

i agree with (racer12306) lets just be friend's

we know your sarcastic NUTMEG,trust me, we know you very well.

i try not to take my anger out on things i buy,or people i love.more like steel dumpster's and brick wall's

funny but true.

Nutmeg · Post by **Nutmeg** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:03 pm

I won't ask...

turbohead · Post by **turbohead** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:13 pm

good.

Post by **Canada** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:59 am

Wow. Out of curiousity, where did you pull that from?

Neons.org?

There are some definite mis-informations and out right false information in there.

Some people will just believe anything won't they?

heyitsstock · Post by **heyitsstock** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:18 pm

Canada wrote:Wow. Out of curiousity, where did you pull that from?

Neons.org?

There are some definite mis-informations and out right false information in there.

Some people will just believe anything won't they?

You don't understand it's the internet. Where I'm always right and you are always wrong.

Danteneon · Post by **Danteneon** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:24 pm

heyitsstock wrote:
Canada wrote:Wow. Out of curiousity, where did you pull that from?

Neons.org?

There are some definite mis-informations and out right false information in there.

Some people will just believe anything won't they?

You don't understand it's the internet. Where I'm always right and you are always wrong.

I believe you are wrong about that. Let me tell you what is correct...

heyitsstock · Post by **heyitsstock** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:28 pm

heyyyyyooooooooo!!! ahahahah

Mr Josh Zombie · Post by **Mr Josh Zombie** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:04 pm

PRESTON!!!! BUDDY!!!!

long time no see!!! how's the UBER FAST neon treating ya guy? Still eating SRTs i take it?

dumbass. leave this site already.

and by the way mods, Jason had TNK txt me specifically that preson was back... and then Frank told me. so i'm allowed to agitate him by that definition.

Danteneon · Post by **Danteneon** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:13 pm

Opi wrote:PRESTON!!!! BUDDY!!!!

long time no see!!! how's the UBER FAST neon treating ya guy? Still eating SRTs i take it?

dumbass. leave this site already.

and by the way mods, Jason had TNK txt me specifically that preson was back... and then Frank told me. so i'm allowed to agitate him by that definition.

Hey, better you called him out than me...but welcome back Preston...again

Post by **Canada** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:26 pm

LoL

I didn't want to be the one that did it, what a surprise, everyone's favourite agitator did it for me.

Thanks again Opi!

Mr Josh Zombie · Post by **Mr Josh Zombie** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:10 pm

It's what I do best, and apparently Jason recognizes this.

SILVER-ES · Post by **SILVER-ES** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:40 pm

Opi wrote:

It's what I do best, and apparently Jason recognizes this.

I got a text too, was at work though.

Mr Josh Zombie · Post by **Mr Josh Zombie** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:43 pm

so why arn't we the "annoy the piss out of trolls" moderators??

SILVER-ES · Post by **SILVER-ES** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:44 pm

That is a very good question....Jason?!?

J-Villa · Post by **J-Villa** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:53 pm

wahahha...

i think mox would get that title if any....

2GN.ORG

the history of our neon's

the history of our neon's

re

Re: re

re

Re: re

Re: the history of our neon's

re