Premium fuel and the R/T
- MyNeonSaysHi
- 2GN Veteran
- Posts: 11898
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Kansas
-
occasional demons
- Junior Admin
- Posts: 20067
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:14 pm
- Location: Ashland Ohio
Regular (87 octane) fuel will be fine for all parameters. It just won't make the same power is all. The knock sensor feedback will basically de tune it, is all. I actually get better fuel mileage with 87 octane than 93. But it just doesn't have that little bit of extra umph, it does with higher octane. It isn't a huge difference, but it is noticeable.
If you don't mind slightly less fuel mileage, and want to boost the octane a little, use 2 or 3 gallons of E85 to a tank of 87 octane. The R/T PCM spark advance responds fairly well to it.
If you don't mind slightly less fuel mileage, and want to boost the octane a little, use 2 or 3 gallons of E85 to a tank of 87 octane. The R/T PCM spark advance responds fairly well to it.
Bill
2000 Neon MTX swap with '02 R/T PCM
1999 neon coupe 2.4 swap
Probably shouldn't listen to anything your penis says, that guy's a dick.
Too much time spent here is a sign of a bad case of Ownaneonvirus.Patience, of course, is a very powerful weapon, but sometimes I start to regret that it is not a firearm.
2000 Neon MTX swap with '02 R/T PCM
1999 neon coupe 2.4 swap
- MyNeonSaysHi
- 2GN Veteran
- Posts: 11898
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Kansas
Are you running a complete R/T setup? Probably lower the gas mileage a bit putting that e85 in there..But it helps the octane since e85 is 104.occasional demons wrote:Regular (87 octane) fuel will be fine for all parameters. It just won't make the same power is all. The knock sensor feedback will basically de tune it, is all. I actually get better fuel mileage with 87 octane than 93. But it just doesn't have that little bit of extra umph, it does with higher octane. It isn't a huge difference, but it is noticeable.
If you don't mind slightly less fuel mileage, and want to boost the octane a little, use 2 or 3 gallons of E85 to a tank of 87 octane. The R/T PCM spark advance responds fairly well to it.
08 Acura TL-S
05 Neon SRT-4
-
occasional demons
- Junior Admin
- Posts: 20067
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:14 pm
- Location: Ashland Ohio
Basically everything but the IM and 3.94 gears.
IM is a Ghetto Blaster with a 3 inch inlet, and 60 mm TB bolted on. If anything, it is more prone to detonation than a full out R/T. The only time that was a problem is when the knock sensor came unplugged.
'02 PCM, '02 cam.
IM is a Ghetto Blaster with a 3 inch inlet, and 60 mm TB bolted on. If anything, it is more prone to detonation than a full out R/T. The only time that was a problem is when the knock sensor came unplugged.
'02 PCM, '02 cam.
Bill
2000 Neon MTX swap with '02 R/T PCM
1999 neon coupe 2.4 swap
Probably shouldn't listen to anything your penis says, that guy's a dick.
Too much time spent here is a sign of a bad case of Ownaneonvirus.Patience, of course, is a very powerful weapon, but sometimes I start to regret that it is not a firearm.
2000 Neon MTX swap with '02 R/T PCM
1999 neon coupe 2.4 swap
- MyNeonSaysHi
- 2GN Veteran
- Posts: 11898
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Kansas
-
redneckmoparman
- 2GN Member
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:35 am
- Location: Olympia, WA
No thats all marketing hype higher octane burns slower allowing higher compression and more timing advance never run higher than reccomended it is a waste you will lose power and mileage running lower than reccomended will lose power also from retarded timing unless you can adjust timing(piggyback ms or 04/05 srt) or have changed compression use reccomended octane there are no added benifits of cleaners and crap thats all bullshit gas is gas just different burn rates
- MyNeonSaysHi
- 2GN Veteran
- Posts: 11898
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Kansas
-
redneckmoparman
- 2GN Member
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:35 am
- Location: Olympia, WA
-
occasional demons
- Junior Admin
- Posts: 20067
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:14 pm
- Location: Ashland Ohio
Well considering his R/T's overall gear ratio is 3.20:1 in fifth vs your 2.88:1, achieving 40 mpg might be a bit more difficult.
Bill
2000 Neon MTX swap with '02 R/T PCM
1999 neon coupe 2.4 swap
Probably shouldn't listen to anything your penis says, that guy's a dick.
Too much time spent here is a sign of a bad case of Ownaneonvirus.Patience, of course, is a very powerful weapon, but sometimes I start to regret that it is not a firearm.
2000 Neon MTX swap with '02 R/T PCM
1999 neon coupe 2.4 swap
- Canada
- Junior Admin
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:05 pm
- Location: Island Grove, Ontario, Canada
And if you don't think the different additive packages each fuel company runs make a difference then you're an idiot. There is independent testing that shows fuels that are rate "Top Tier" promote much cleaner combustion chambers and valves which helps to keep the engine running properly and efficiently.
Also, Bill has a very valid point that the RT tranny and final drive makes it much harder to get higher mpg based on much higher rpm at cruising speeds.
Also, Bill has a very valid point that the RT tranny and final drive makes it much harder to get higher mpg based on much higher rpm at cruising speeds.
- MyNeonSaysHi
- 2GN Veteran
- Posts: 11898
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Kansas
- stringburner
- 2GN Member
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:25 pm
I average between 27 and 32 mpg in my '03 R/T on 87 octane. I've never once encountered detonation since I've been driving it in August of 2010, and I live in a mountainous/hilly location. it seems to run perfectly fine on low test. I've tried premium several times and like Bill I had a reduction in fuel economy.
When i was doing very consistant MPG testing with my old breeze I calculated that i would be better off paying up to ~29c MORE per Gal for E0 v E10. In the last few years im fairly certain all stations in my area are atleast E5 regardless of the grade, but ive only tested a few brands.Canada wrote:Up here at least, one major difference between 87 / 89 / 91 is not only octane, but also ETHANOL content. They add between 10-15% in 87, 5-10% in 89 and 0% in 91, that will definitely effect your fuel economy.
tro
03 SRT
Now building for GS
Now building for GS
- MyNeonSaysHi
- 2GN Veteran
- Posts: 11898
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Kansas
Yeah I forgot about ethanol.. Up to 10% here so it probably is 10%. No wonder.Canada wrote:Up here at least, one major difference between 87 / 89 / 91 is not only octane, but also ETHANOL content. They add between 10-15% in 87, 5-10% in 89 and 0% in 91, that will definitely effect your fuel economy.
08 Acura TL-S
05 Neon SRT-4
-
Fuzzyneon
- 2009 Silver Contributor
- Posts: 4872
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:48 am
- Location: Waterford works ,NJ
this^ just put 93 (or 91) in it its not a big deal its not dollars more a gallon no reason not to its what it is reccomendedRawkBunny wrote:Gas prices are up over $5/gal in some parts down here, but I'll be damned if I put anything but premium in the car, if that's what it recommends.
im sure if you wanna run regular you can but i wouldnt i want to get the most out of every car i drive
Member of Spork Racing
2002 Dodge Neon
Frankenstien
2002 Dodge Neon
Frankenstien

