What I said is exactly true. The pcm CAN NOT make up for a less energy dense fuel.occasional demons wrote:Not really true.fusion210 wrote:One important factor would be the ethanol content of the gas you're using. E10 will get worse mileage than straight gasoline.
With a carburetor/distributor controlling the spark curve, more likely, but the PCM can make up for it.
I have used up to 4 gallons of E85, and not seen much of a difference in miles than I usually get. 2 gallons E85 to a tank seems to actually do better than straight E10. If the PCM has enough spark advance available, it is going to use it.
If the pcm can 'make up for' less energy dense fuel, all of the current cars on the road that can switch from e85 or straight gas wouldn't have much of a change in mileage right?

~31-35% loss per gallon. It's obvious to see that there is a decrease in mpg from adding ethanol. Sure e10 won't give a 30% decrease from straight gasoline, but the example I gave clearly shows a decrease. You can't get more energy out of a fuel that has less energy.