What I'm wondering is if, when starting up a steep hill, you take your foot off the brake, and then engage the clutch while accelerating - which causes you to fall backward (ever-so-slightly!) until the clutch is engaged and the acceleration brings you up the hill.
Or do you use your handbrake to keep you in place until the clutch is engaged? Then, you don't fall back at all.
A third option, according to that article, is the Hill-Holder™ that Studebaker invented. When you stop, it holds the brake in place until the clutch is engaged. They say it's only available now these days on Subaru Foresters (so I guess that only trolls (we still love you anyway) and people with savvy mods use them).
Or maybe for those of you without the Hill-Holder™, you alternate between the fall-back and the handbrake methods. That's what I do, depending on my mood. If I'm nervous or feel like doing something with my hands, I use my handbrake. Also, if an arsehat stops too close to me, I use my handbrake. Otherwise, I fall back (ever-so-slightly!) like most other Americans that I know.
One thing is for sure - I'll be using the handbrake all the time if I drive in Europe. After all, the article says that if you don't use the handbrake to keep you from falling backward (even ever-so-slightly), you'll fail the driving test there.
You can answer in the poll - and give some input on your humble opinion here







