

New toy at the dealership. I don't care for the chin spoiler though...


Agreed. It doesn't flow with anything else on the car.BlackRoseRacing wrote:I don't care for the chin spoiler though...

Dammit Man! wrote:Agreed. It doesn't flow with anything else on the car.BlackRoseRacing wrote:I don't care for the chin spoiler though...
my '68 Chevelle SS396 4-speed.a23dranger wrote: but out of the 3 muscle cars. i have to give it to....

I'd give the award to any original idea car (1968), over rehashing old ideas and not coming up with anything new (2008). But I'm obsessed with aerodynamics and don't think old boxes should be reborn when futuristic tron-like mobiles and crazy awesome shit COULD be being made. I love the old cars for what they are, I hate the new muscle cars for what they're trying to be. Why look to the past for inspitation when the future is so much more amazing?JeffB#2 wrote:my '68 Chevelle SS396 4-speed.a23dranger wrote: but out of the 3 muscle cars. i have to give it to....
done.

true... any pre 73 muscle car is awesome. i meant currentlyJeffB#2 wrote: my '68 Chevelle SS396 4-speed.
done.
UriahRR wrote: I'd give the award to any original idea car (1968), over rehashing old ideas and not coming up with anything new (2008). But I'm obsessed with aerodynamics and don't think old boxes should be reborn when futuristic tron-like mobiles and crazy awesome shit COULD be being made. I love the old cars for what they are, I hate the new muscle cars for what they're trying to be. Why look to the past for inspitation when the future is so much more amazing?


