2013 Dart complaints.

titansxt · Post by **titansxt** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 1:12 am

04 Mo Neon wrote:It's just a guess at the demographics from personal observations. Has a similar feel to it as a jetta and I know my friends would destroy me with jokes if I had a jetta.

But for the lulz... but still kinda true..

Red=COMES IN 12 SHADES OF RED?
Compact 4 door with utility=DESIGNED FOR C SEGMENT.
Cheap=STARTS AT 15K, GOES UP FROM THERE.
Low HP=THREE ENTRY ENGINE CHOICES.
Amenities=MAKE-UP CAN'T OWN ANYTHING. NO NEED FOR THE 's.
Small=SMALL DOES NOT EQUAL COMPACT? SEE LINE TWO.
Overdone interior=CHEAP AND OVERDONE? CHOOSE ONE.
Drag stance=I NEVER KNEW THAT WAS A QUALITY CONCERN.

There is plenty about this car I am not pleased about, but I think it is a huge step in the right direction. By the time the SRT and or refresh hits the streets this car will have it's roots planted firmly. Think about the 2000-2002 Neon and the refresh to the 2003-2005 design. I think it was a big improvement. What about the refresh on the Genesis coupe? Looks great!

You also brought up the FT-86. Were you really comparing that to the Dart?! You are comparing apples to a f-ing apple pie. Barring anything exploding on the Dart, it is going to dominate the market.

JeffM · Post by **JeffM** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:21 am

As much as I agree with you, and find it funny there are already complaints about a car that hasn't hit the market yet, did we really need another thread?

titansxt · Post by **titansxt** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:46 am

JeffM wrote:As much as I agree with you, and find it funny there are already complaints about a car that hasn't hit the market yet, did we really need another thread?

Yes we did. I did not want the other thread, with a lot of useful info, being locked or cluttered up. Some mods get lock happy.

C1DoG · Post by **C1DoG** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:51 am

Why we just wait until the car actually comes out and have test driven one, before we complain about it!!! No sense in complaining about a car you haven't even driven!

r/tguy02 · Post by **r/tguy02** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:31 am

LowNSlow · Post by **LowNSlow** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:34 am

titansxt wrote:
JeffM wrote:As much as I agree with you, and find it funny there are already complaints about a car that hasn't hit the market yet, did we really need another thread?
Yes we did. I did not want the other thread, with a lot of useful info, being locked or cluttered up. Some mods get lock happy.

Oh yea???

I agree it's a little silly to have the laundry list of complaints about a car that isn't even out yet...

stdlystdmufn · Post by **stdlystdmufn** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:55 pm

umm ive got a complaint...they dropped the dual dry clutch atx from fiat in favor of the hyundai atx. so im kinda pissed b/c i really wanted to drive the ddc trans

UriahRR · Post by **UriahRR** » Sun Feb 12, 2012 1:13 pm

This car has no apples.

Toyota 86, there's the pie.

Danteneon · Post by **Danteneon** » Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:51 am

Pfft. Forget Toyota, get the BRZ. So what if Toyota came up with the basic design...certain mandatory specs...finacing...and trans and rear axle assemblies. The Subaru looks better dammit!

UriahRR · Post by **UriahRR** » Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:40 am

No. See although it's a Subaru engine, the Subaru test says it leans towards understeering like the rest of the Subaru line while the Scion they say is more twitchy and better for the 50/50 weight feel the car was going for.

Trust me, I'd take a mighty Subaru over the preppy little bitch Scion any day, but I'm really only interested in driving characteristics of a car like this so Scion wins. Who knows, maybe I'll throw a Toyota badge on it to class it up a little. Then again, why not throw a Lexus emblem on it and call it a baby LFA? The possibilities are limitless.

Danteneon · Post by **Danteneon** » Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:59 am

I read that too. I would imagine it wouldn't take much to make the car rotate a bit easier. Hell, I got the Neon to oversteer on command...how hard could it be?

Oh yeah, this thread is supposed to be for the lousy Dart.