Giving Neons a bad name

titansxt · Post by **titansxt** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:23 pm

Floyd · Post by **Floyd** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 pm

looks like an 03+ rear

J-Villa · Post by **J-Villa** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:45 pm

def 03+ rear end haha

MyNeonSaysHi · Post by **MyNeonSaysHi** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:30 pm

YEah, typical 03 + owners

kc2005ptgt · Post by **kc2005ptgt** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:36 pm

Whew, good thing it is an 03, you know, a 3gn (or 2.5gn) and not an 00-02, 2gn

03sxt · Post by **03sxt** » Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:01 am

Gee, maybe I'll get those plates.

Floyd · Post by **Floyd** » Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:16 am

raul-01 wrote:YEah, typical 03 + owners

What you trying say?

hehe

DannyBoy · Post by **DannyBoy** » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:49 pm

02 > 03

amirite?

titansxt · Post by **titansxt** » Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:15 pm

u r amwrong.

scneonchic · Post by **scneonchic** » Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:06 am

01, 02 >03

dblsg · Post by **dblsg** » Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:35 am

scneonchic501 wrote:01, 02 >03

scneonchic · Post by **scneonchic** » Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:37 am

dblsg wrote:
scneonchic501 wrote:01, 02 >03 (Except db's neon! haha)

fixed it!

dblsg · Post by **dblsg** » Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:47 am

scneonchic501 wrote:
dblsg wrote:
scneonchic501 wrote:01, 02 >03 (Except db's neon! haha)

fixed it!

hahaha,

refect · Post by **refect** » Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:42 pm

scneonchic501 wrote:01, 02 >03

i concur haha

dblsg · Post by **dblsg** » Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:29 pm

^ its

scneonchic501 wrote:01, 02 >03 (Except db's neon! haha)

get it right